Epstein Secrets

Jeffrey Criminal Files Attorneys Ken Starr Alan Dershowitz Jack Goldberger Jay Lefkowitz Marty Weinberg Darren Indyke Reid Weingarten Jerry Lefcourt (?) Roy Black Bruce Reinhart (?) Bob Critton (?)

effrey Criminal Files Attorneys Ken Starr Alan Dershowitz Jack Goldberger Jay Lefkowitz Marty Weinberg

Jeffrey Criminal Files Attorneys Ken Starr Alan Dershowitz Jack Goldberger Jay Lefkowitz Marty

Jeffrey Criminal Files Attorneys Ken Starr Alan Dershowitz Jack Goldberger Jay Lefkowitz Marty Weinberg Darren Indyke Reid Weingarten Jerry Lefcourt (?) Roy Black Bruce Reinhart (?) Bob Critton (?) Bill Riley (?) Chris Knight (?) Lily Sanchez (?) Guy Lewis (?) Mike Tein (?) What Should Be

Let me see the statements again, please. 16 MR. INDYKE: Objection. To the extent the 17 knowledge of the facts of this case derive from 18 Mr. Dershowitz's representation of Mr. Epstein, 19 I don't think he can answer that question 20 without violating the privilege. 21 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: H

nto 20 attorney-client. 21 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead ad make 22 your point. 23 MR. INDYKE: My point is that it sounds to 24 me that Alan is now discussing attorney-client 25 matters and internal decisions and strategies www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615700 580 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

HOWITZ www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615767 647 ERRATA SHEET DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT - ENTER CHANGES HERE In Re: BRADLEY EDWARDS, ET AL., V. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ Case No.: ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ January 12, 2016 PAGE LINE CHANGE REASON Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing d

www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615741 621 1 unprofessional? 2 A. Not only would it be unprofessional, it 3 would involve you also to accuse Jerry Lefcourt, to 4 accuse Roy Black, to accuse Ken Starr. All of us 5 stood behind our client's defense, and we were 6 successful. We persuaded the United S

A Right. 16 Q -- her pros memo, her proposed indictment, this 17 analysis she did as evidenced in Exhibit 8, but also the 18 submissions from Jerry Lefcourt, and that -- that had 19 not had a chance to actually make a presentation to them. 20 response is on page three, his last paragraph. 21 He chi

A Right. 16 Q -- her pros memo, her proposed indictment, this 17 analysis she did as evidenced in Exhibit 8, but also the 18 submissions from Jerry Lefcourt, and that -- that had 19 not had a chance to actually make a presentation to them. 20 response is on page three, his last paragraph. 21 He chi

A Right. 16 Q -- her pros memo, her proposed indictment, this 17 analysis she did as evidenced in Exhibit 8, but also the 18 submissions from Jerry Lefcourt, and that -- that had 19 not had a chance to actually make a presentation to them. 20 response is on page three, his last paragraph. 21 He chi

bell a little 3 bit. One of the defense attorneys who was present there in 4 addition to Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, and Lillian Sanchez 5 was Alan Dershowitz. 6 A Yeah. 7 Q Does that ring a bell? 8 A So, it does. There's -- 9 Q Okay. 10 A I -- I can't say it's a recollection, but it sounds 1

ourt, Roy Black, and Lillian Sanchez 5 was Alan Dershowitz. 6 A Yeah. 7 Q Does that ring a bell? 8 A

bell a little 3 bit. One of the defense attorneys who was present there in 4 addition to Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, and Lillian Sanchez 5 was Alan Dershowitz. 6 A Yeah. 7 Q Does that ring a bell? 8 A So, it does. There's -- 9 Q Okay. 10 A I -- I can't say it's a recollection, but it sounds 1

ourt, Roy Black, and Lillian Sanchez 5 was Alan Dershowitz. 6 A Yeah. 7 Q Does that ring a bell? 8 A

bell a little 3 bit. One of the defense attorneys who was present there in 4 addition to Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, and Lillian Sanchez 5 was Alan Dershowitz. 6 A Yeah. 7 Q Does that ring a bell? 8 A So, it does. There's -- 9 Q Okay. 10 A I -- I can't say it's a recollection, but it sounds 1

ourt, Roy Black, and Lillian Sanchez 5 was Alan Dershowitz. 6 A Yeah. 7 Q Does that ring a bell? 8 A