Epstein Secrets

yde and Conyers replied: REP. HYDE: I thank you, Professor Dershowitz. I don't thank you for criticizing the motives, s

apacities, recently told me that before anything involving these issues left his office, Senator Kennedy would tell his staff members, “check it with Alan.” It was high honor and privilege to assist so great a senator on so many occasions. The last time I was him was just months before his death when he

ny real sense that justice in some way had gone astray.” And one commentator snidely observed that Von Bulow’s “recruitment of Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz shortly after his conviction would tend to reinforce” the view that Claus Von Bulow “was no longer protecting his innocence, merely the methods used

his conviction would tend to reinforce” the view that Claus Von Bulow “was no longer protecting his innocence, merely the methods used to catch him...Dershowitz enjoys a wide reputation as a last resort for convicted criminals, being especially keep at finding legal loopholes that render his clients’ convicti

of [the new book.] Woody and Mia both insisted that the Rosenberg’s were innocent and I promised to send them the evidence that Julius was a spy and Ethel a collaborator if not a conspirator. Over the next several years I saw Woody and Mia on a few occasions. Mia called me a few times to discuss politi

a state sentencing is. amongst many other issues. properly within the aegis of state decision making. Your December 19 letter references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Statute § 796.03. Professor Dershowitz made such arguments in the context of saying that he had been u

that "we have reiterated in previous submissions that Mr. Epstein does not believe he is 'See July 6, 2007 letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt, Esq. and Alan Dershowitz. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013363 EFTA00230268 12/28/07 FRI 14:27 FAX 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE 1002 guilty of the federal charges enu

ision making. Your December 19 letter references Professor Dershowitz's position on the inapplicability of Florida Sta

6, 2007 letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt, Esq. and Alan Dershowitz. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013363

of how fairly to implement the § 2255 portions of the Agreement so that real victims, if any. who in filet sutkred "personal injury as a result of Ethel violation"' if any of specified federal criminal statutes such as I X U.S.C. § 2422(h) arc placed in the same position as if there had been a tria

fore the Grand Jury to seek an indictment against Jeffrey Epstein. Due to subsequent meetings with the State Attorney's Office and Defense Attorney Alan Dershowitz the Grand Jury was postponed until a later time. Dershowitz had provided a package of material on the main victims in this case in which they appea

. Due to subsequent meetings with the State Attorney's Office and Defense Attorney Alan Dershowitz the Grand Jury was postponed until a later time. Dershowitz had provided a package of material on the main victims in this case in which they appear on myspace.com and speak about alcohol use and some mariju

the State Attorney's Office and Defense Attorney Alan Dershowitz the Grand Jury was postponed until a

g tl well probly chill before then but still it funilliWe miss youll!! 11/13/2005 1:19:00 PM Thanxs for the addl I though you may this... Lisa (Ethel) 11/11/2005 11:39:00 AM hey hun i had tons of fun with y. a y, I'm so excited about you moving we're gonna have a blast. Still can't be got chris

b Jose hsber for this assignment. In fact, when I told you of Judge selection during our meeting last Wednesday, November 21th, you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surprised, with the selection. Podhurst and Josephsberg are no strangers to nearly the entire Epstein de

r meeting last Wednesday, November 21th, you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surpr

of how birly to implement the § 2255 portions of the iNgretanent so that real victims, if any. who in bet suffered -personal injury as a result of Ethel violation- if any of specified federal criminal statutes such as 1X U.S.C. § 2422(h) are placed in the same position as if there had been a trial

0 Fax: 305 358-2382 Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

ng are in effect asking courts to alter that language, and lijourts have no authority to alter statutory language.... We cannot add to the terms of Ethel provision what Congress left out.' Merritt, 120 F.3d at 1 187." See also Dodd U S , 125 S.Ct. 2478 (2005); 73 Am.Jur.2d Statutes §124. Title 18 o

jphesearcylaw.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

ng are in effect asking courts to alter that language, and '[c]ourts have no authority to alter statutory language.... We cannot add to the terms of Ethel provision what Congress left out.' Merritt, 120 F.3d at 1187." See also Dodd v. U.S. 125 S.Ct. 2478 (2005); 73 Am.Jur.2d Statutes §124. Title 18 o

aw Office of Mark E. Pena, Michael A. Gold, Todd Alan Foster, Cohen, Jayson & Foster, Tampa, FL, G. Ma

of compulsory process, and thus are difficult to identify or interview," such that "(lequiring extensive investigation would defeat the purpose of Ethel motion." Id. Of course, the movant must provide "enough information to enable the District Court to balance the parties' interests." Id. The court