Epstein Secrets

ive than any winch i, or the prosecutors in my office, had previously encountered. Mr. Epstein hired an army of legal superstars: Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Judge and then Pepperdine Law Dean Kenneth Starr, former Deputy Assistant to the President and then Kirkland & Ellis Partner Jay Lefkowitz,

this case. He was aware of the tactics of the defense, and he called to praise our prosecutors for holding firm against the likes of Messrs. Black, Dershowitz, Lefkowitz and Starr. It was a proud moment. I also received calls or communications from Messrs. Dershowitz, Le&owitz and Starr. I had known all t

d an army of legal superstars: Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Judge and then Pepperdine Law

y in its response to hearing the District Attorney disavow the reliability of the Board's recommendation, in receiving the arguments of counsel for Appellant, and in rendering its Order as a whole. First, although the SORA statute clearly contemplates that the District Attorney may depart from the Board'

many SORAs much less troubling than this one where the People would never make a downward departure like this.16 A.84:21-85:10 (Tr.). Later, when Appellant's counsel disputed that there were any credible -- much less prosecuted -- allegations that Appellant ever used force, the Court again began compar

ICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, CASE NO.: 15-000072 Plaintiff(s), JUDGE: LYNCH v. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. I MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER DENYING NON- PARTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO OUASH SUBPOENA Jeffrey Epstein (her

000072 Plaintiff(s), JUDGE: LYNCH v. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. I MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF TH

NO.: 15-000072 Plaintiff(s), JUDGE: LYNCH v. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. I MOTION FOR RECONSI

inst appellant and had the summons served upon appellant on the day he arrived at appellee's offices to participate in settlement negotiations. Id. Appellant moved to quash the service and the trial court denied the motion. The Third District, however, agreed that said service "was occasioned by fraud an

istrict Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. /s/ St

in John Doe 6 v. Diocese of Orlando, case no. 48-2005-010138-0, Ninth Judicial Circuit for Orange County, Florida; and an upcoming deadline to file Appellant's initial Brief in Jane Doe v. Florida International University Board of Trustees case no. 3D09-414, Florida Third District Court of Appeals. 4.

secute him without an indict- ment. See 1 Charles Alan Wright, Fed. Prac- tice & Procedure § 121, at 518

Cir. 1993) further findings and reconsideration in actor- justice to grant transfer. dance with the foregoing. § 6032. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, I Lemrick NELSON, Jr., Defendant- Appellee. No. 421, Docket 95-1271. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Aug. 29, 1996. De

ent's (unopposed) motion. FN3.See a1so3 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice & Procedure § 52

since in each of these cases the first letter had ban sent to the wrong ad- dress. The decision of the Tax Court Is af- firmed. Harold R. STEINER, Appellant, v. Theodore ROOM United States Coinage. stoner for the Southern District of Cat tong* Central Division, and Robert W. Ware, United States Marsh

d and Facsmile this ( klay of May, 2009 to: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., ... . ---- Aiterbury Goldberge

769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 Ha. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant, v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appellee. No. 99.2182. Oct. 27, 1999. Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1999. Following divorce, parties agreed to modification of

xie Highway, West Pahnl3each, EL 3.340 . Ow.: ; I . • • ; .141 1,.0 i • : ., - ' . . i I: ! . - . : • . • - .•:il : r !, .!• . I Alan qoldberger; EN:, Atterbuty Goldberger, et al, 250 S.:AnStrialitair;Aire., Ste; 1400, West IN; ... ': ' Palm Beach, FL 33401..(4a: . ); and Bradley

stlaw. 76912d 389 769 2d 389 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 ..241 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant, v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appel lee. No. 99.2182. Oct. 27, 1999. Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1999. Following divorce, parties agreed to modification of