ood hedge material for purposes of "symmetry". Such a requirement is not in conformity with the Agreement. 4. ARCOM abused its discretion in denying Appellant’s request since it is unreasonable to require new and additional planting outside of the clearly limited requirements of the Agreement. 5. Any actio

for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sle