Epstein Secrets

Plaza New York, New York 10007 January 8, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you request a bill of particulars in the above-captioned matter

on over time (see, e.g., SDNY_GM_00000423- SDNY— GM 00000524); documentary evidence, including travel

w York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your le

rnheim New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to

nd tempt him to tailor proof to explain it away, or see to it that the government's proof is not presented." (citations omitted)); United States v. Guerrerio, 670 F. Supp. 1215, 1225 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) (A bill of particulars "is not a discovery tool and is not intended to allow defendants a preview of the ev

P.C. Dear Counsel: The Silvio I. Motto Building January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you request a bill of particulars in the above-captioned matter

bbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your le

ices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to

nd tempt him to tailor proof to explain it away, or see to it that the government's proof is not presented." (citations omitted)); United States v. Guerrerio, 670 F. Supp. 1215, 1225 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) (A bill of particulars "is not a discovery tool and is not intended to allow defendants a preview of the ev

One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you request a bill of particulars in the above-captioned matte

bbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response to your l

ices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response t

nd tempt him to tailor proof to explain it away, or see to it that the government's proof is not presented." (citations omitted)); United States v. Guerrerio, 670 F. Supp. 1215, 1225 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) (A bill of particulars "is not a discovery tool and is not intended to allow defendants a preview of the ev