Epstein Secrets

ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in opposition to the defendant's letter of August 10, 2020 (t

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

tective order expressly precludes. See Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) (Dkt. 1100). Mor

overnment to disclose evidence or witnesses to be offered prior to trial") (emphasis added) (quotations and citation omitted); cf. United States v. Sindone, 01 Cr. 517 (MBM), 2002 WL 48604, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2002) (denying a motion for a bill of particulars to identify "the unnamed alleged victi

ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in opposition to the defendant's letter of August 10, 2020 (t

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

tective order expressly precludes. See Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) (Dkt. 1100). Mor

overnment to disclose evidence or witnesses to be offered prior to trial") (emphasis added) (quotations and citation omitted); cf. United States v. Sindone, 01 Cr. 517 (MBM), 2002 WL 48604, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2002) (denying a motion for a bill of particulars to identify "the unnamed alleged victi

P.C. Dear Counsel: The Silvio I. Motto Building January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you request a bill of particulars in the above-captioned matter

bbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your le

ices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to

ed to disclose additional details about its case." United States v. Payden, 613 F. Supp. 800, 816 (S.D.N.Y. 1985); see also, e.g., United States v. Sindone, No. 01 Cr. 517 (MBM), 2002 WL 48604, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2002) (a defendant may not "use a bill of particulars to preview the government's evi

One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you request a bill of particulars in the above-captioned matte

bbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response to your l

ices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response t

ed to disclose additional details about its case." United States v. Payden, 613 F. Supp. 800, 816 (S.D.N.Y. 1985); see also, e.g., United States v. Sindone, No. 01 Cr. 517 (MBM), 2002 WL 48604, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2002) (a defendant may not "use a bill of particulars to preview the government's evi