Epstein Secrets

308-3I40 Questions about your statement? Can your financial Advisor or the RMA R Ois • 1000. accoun Resource Management Account January 2018 GHISLAINE MAXWELL PO. BOX 308 TEANECK NJ 07666-0308 Value of your account on December 29(11 on January 3! (1) YOUr assets 41,946 32 36,522 63 Visit o Er wabsito:

7504 YI 23576550 °COCO) Page S of 6 SDNY_GM_00325155 EFTA_00197930 EFTA01307196 UBS Resource Management Account February 2018 Account name: CHSLANE MAXWELL Friendly account narniiilia. Account number. Your limeade. Advisor: SCOTT STACK MANLYIE CASPIEL Account activity this month (Continued) Ozte A

3S UBS Financial Serertee Inc Prwate Wealth Management 299 Park Avenue 26th Floor New York NY 10171-0002 CNP7o0569367SOSIS x4 TI Account name: AlISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Iodise CheOc/Car Account number: Your 15 nand./ Advisor. SCOTT TACK MaIVIYIE CASRIEL Phone Resource Management Account

76550 ICOOCO P•g• 4 of 6 SDNY_GM_00325202 EFTA_00197977 EFTA01307243 UBS Resource Management Account August 2018 Your assets Account name: GFISLAPIE MAXWELL Friendly account n -Indio. lidr t Account number. Sane Orden. +none and sawn adves shorten may ee ecionaimole As a iestit. sans andioues nor not

57%04 X123576550 1IO000 Page 2 of 6 SDNY_GM_00325234 EFTA_0O198009 EFTA01307275 UBS Resource Management Account December 20)8 Account name: GFISLABIE MAXWELL Friendly account narrowIntim ChedslCar Account number. Change in the value of your account Cash activity summary December 2018 01 Year to date

Cash/ATM transactions 1.85 Vca credst XXX8 1602 G MAXWELL Oct 16 Oct 17 CASSICONNECT 4203.50 ATM FEE R

BS UEIS Financial Services Private Wealth Management 299 Park ANTAL?. 25th Floor New York NY 10i71-0002 CHP7c0s6930290210 m 0 Account nattier: GHISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name: lndiv Check/Car Account number Your financial Advisor: SCOTT STACKMANILYLE CASRIEL Phone. Resource Management Account F

n 4 Withdrawal ACH WITHDRAWAL UNITECHEALTHONE Jar 9 Wthdrawal ACH WITHDRAWAL Saks Petal -934 SS Total bill payments 413.436.12 Account name: LANE MAXWELL Friendly account name- . net C Account number Your Pineadai Advisor: SCOTT STACKMANLYLE CASRIEI. DeS(OpliOn Amount IS) -1 1)352 84 -39 9A

account name: Iodise CheOc/Car Account number: Your 15 nand./ Advisor. SCOTT TACK MaIVIYIE CASRIEL Phone Resource Management Account May 2018 GHISLAINE MAXWELL Questions about your statement? Call your financial Advisor a the Value of your account RMA Resourceline at 800-FtMa- 1000, account 0290

scription of the alternative investment °Cy& byes in Important information about your statement at Me end of this document Your retina objective: Conseil income & capital appreciation Your risk profile: Pnmary • Agg remote thvesunent ehgristray consderation • Nene :elected 7,594 7,594 Your accoun

ority of the bars that might be relied upon by Ms Maxwells require the extradition judge to make a finding

ts, a review that formed the basis of changes to the 2003 Extradition Act. (Id. Annex B ¶ 3.1). In Mr. Perry's opinion, it is "highly unlikely that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able successfully to resist extradition to the United States" in connection with this case. (Perry Rep. 12(e)). After concluding that none

ide any answer on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by

seding indictment dated 7 July 2020. In addition to those conclusions, the following three points may be made. 3. First, as noted in the Opinion2, Ms Maxwell's waiver of extradition would be admissible in any extradition proceedings in England and Wales. While such a document cannot compel a requested pers

r, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell II EFTA00093319 cailase:20-agloDacument ntlinfiAtIllf0891, 806E128B2Blage34figrl 3tI 4 Exhibit A EFTA00093320 Ckast.20-U-0003.00dblit DOditrehlei

om and Hong Kong successfully challenged a decision from the French authorities not to extradite an individual whose extradition they had requested (Conseil d'Etat, 15 October1993, no. 142578). In the Peterson case, the American government did not 2 Circulairc Mandat d'arret curopecn ct Extradition n° C

he European Court of Human Rights Part II — The likely outcome of an extradition request from the United States of America to France in the case of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell A. General bars to extradition B. The protection of nationals from extradition under French law and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France:

nal ties of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell and her French nationality appear as one of the grounds for which bail was denied by the Court, which found that: "Ms Maxwell's history and characteristics support the position of her posing a risk of flight. Ms Maxwell has substantial international ties and could facilitate

she has signed an irrevocable Waiver in the USA; the fact that in the present situation, the only way the issue would be raised in France is if Ms. Maxwell would have already fled to France in violation of very strict bail conditions, and the fact that a failure by French authorities to grant extraditio

ection of nationals from extradition in the French legal system and in the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France (B). It will conclude that Ms Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA would not be legally barred by her French citizenship, and that it is highly unlikely, under the specif

he USA and France: Lack of an absolute protection 23 Cass. Crim., 21 November 2007, No. 07-87540. 24 See by contrast, a 2016 recent decision of the Conseil dErat to deny extradition to Russia of a prominent figure of the Kazakh opposition, Moukhtar Abliazov, on the ground that the request was politicall

he European Court of Human Rights Part II — The likely outcome of an extradition request from the United States of America to France in the case of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell A. General bars to extradition B. The protection of nationals from extradition under French law and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France:

nal ties of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell and her French nationality appear as one of the grounds for which bail was denied by the Court, which found that: "Ms Maxwell's history and characteristics support the position of her posing a risk of flight. Ms Maxwell has substantial international ties and could facilitate

she has signed an irrevocable Waiver in the USA; the fact that in the present situation, the only way the issue would be raised in France is if Ms. Maxwell would have already fled to France in violation of very strict bail conditions, and the fact that a failure by French authorities to grant extraditio

ection of nationals from extradition in the French legal system and in the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France (B). It will conclude that Ms Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA would not be legally barred by her French citizenship, and that it is highly unlikely, under the specif

he USA and France: Lack of an absolute protection 23 Cass. Crim., 21 November 2007, No. 07-87540. 24 See by contrast, a 2016 recent decision of the Conseil dErat to deny extradition to Russia of a prominent figure of the Kazakh opposition, Moukhtar Abliazov, on the ground that the request was politicall

any answer on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by

on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by France i

om and Hong Kong successfully challenged a decision from the French authorities not to extradite an individual whose extradition they had requested (Conseil d'Etat, 15 October1993, no. 142578). In the Peterson case, the American government did not 2 Circulaire Mandat d'arret europeen et Extradition n° CRI

issue and execute an extradition decree against Ms. Maxwell, particularly if Ms. Maxwell has signed an irrevo

ide any answer on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by

on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by France i

issue and execute an extradition decree against Ms. Maxwell, particularly if Ms. Maxwell has signed an irrevo

om and Hong Kong successfully challenged a decision from the French authorities not to extradite an individual whose extradition they had requested (Conseil d'Etat, 15 October1993, no. 142578). In the Peterson case, the American government did not 2 Circulaire Mandat d'arret europeen et Extradition n° C

am gst Patemern a sty aCHt0sai Oksintata you May 'Mee. please araxt THESE DISCLOSURES ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS CONFIDENTIAL SDNY GM 00018518 03001lat •laCCO2.0334408PflailUartscOn NO US L CONFIDENTIAL FirstBankPR005681 EFTA_00129161 EFTA01272587 1 First Bank CHECK IMAGES

et et ma SO )1),.. ewe use ethereal., Ian; the teed area m le w'oet cur rvesagron r you [biro PM matt nicest? AM Its Ekm roared Plat AU OVSert you Conseil in smug rd an not wane wean re prow-6N tale. se may net reonsratei awe you Mo% Elect/0W Funds Integers nclade secirenc sensation nlaied ttraa, so