Epstein Secrets

ir article (the "2005 Vanity Fair Article"). See Vicky Ward, "The Talented Mr. Epstein," Vanity F

knowledge. The majority of Mr. Cassell's assertions in his affidavit are based on a 2005 Vanity Fair article (the "2005 Vanity Fair Article"). See Vicky Ward, "The Talented Mr. Epstein," Vanity Fair chttp://vickyward.com/wordpress/archives/30> (January 24, 2005; accessed June 24, 2009). Mr. Cassell

cle (the "2005 Vanity Fair Article"). See Vicky Ward, "The Talented Mr. Epstein," Vanity Fair c

ion and freeze them so that they may be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment." a at 1527. The court went on to cite an oft- quoted passage from the United States Supreme Court in De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 221 (1945): To sustain the challenged order would create a precedent of sweeping e

o is Jeffrey" The Talented Mr. Epstein, By Vicky Ward on January, 2005 in Published Work, Vanity Fair (

afts to is Jeffrey" The Talented Mr. Epstein, By Vicky Ward on January, 2005 in Published Work, Vanity F

omments that, "I'm on my 20th book... The only person outside of my immediate family that I send drafts to is Jeffrey" The Talented Mr. Epstein, By Vicky Ward on January, 2005 in Published Work, Vanity Fair (See article attached as Exhibit "OO"); (c) Epstein's housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez testified that D

sponsibilities, PAUL G. CASSELL clerked first for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (1984-1985) and then from 1985 to 1986 clerked for the United States Supreme Court before serving as an Associate Deputy Attorney EFTA00188845 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM L,,,,ument 291-10 Entered on FLSD 01/21/2015 Page 3 of 7 Edwa

knowledge. The majority of Mr. Cassell's assertions in his affidavit are based on a 2005 Vanity Fair article (the "2005 Vanity Fair Article"). See Vicky Ward, "The Talented Mr. Epstein," Vanity Fair <http://vickyward.com/wordpress/archives/30>, (January 24, 2005; accessed June 24, 2009). Mr.

actually stated "[t]alk that Epstein had moved himself and his assets to Israel reached the ears of such luminaries as Harvey Weinstein .... " See Vicky Ward, "You Will Have Jeffrey Epstein to Kick Around!" Vanity Fair <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2008/05/vicky-ward-you.html>, (May 7, 2008; ac

n and freeze them so that they may be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment." Id. at 1527. The court went on to cite an oft- quoted passage from the United States Supreme Court in De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 221 (1945): To sustain the challenged order would create a precedent of sweeping e

eral criminal restitution proceedings was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2014. That case, United States v. Paroline, led to the Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act of 2018 which passed the House and Senate by unanimous consent and was signed into law in 2018.

hairman of the Board James Marsh has over 30 years of experience advocating for children, victims, and survivors from New York City family court to the United States Supreme Court. The organization he founded in Washington, DC—the Children's Law Center—has helped over 50,000 at-risk and vulnerable children receive free legal

. PA- MICHAEL ). PIKE DAVID A. YAREMA if LOIUDA WARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2nomirrao TO maw! I

te, Defendant's position as to the meaning of the statute would prevail. See United States'. Santos 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: 5 See argument in sections (2) and (3) that follow which represent the predicate for the rule of lenity issue discussed

. •526 Fitch & Grant, of New York City (Elihu Root and William D. Guthrie, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Jacob Ruppert. Before WARD, ROGERS, and HOUGH, Circuit Judges. WARD, Circuit Judge. These three cases involve the same question, and in each the appeal is from an order of

7. Corte 4w4$9(2) The state courts are the final arbiters of the meaning and appropriate application of state statutes, subject only to review by the United States Supreme Court if such construction or application is appropriately challenged on constitutional grounds. & Coons itio508(7) Interference with the process of th

urn. They regard him as a scholar in a class with Ward Churchill. He’s the Colorado professor who called

pers was then published by Beacon Press of Boston. I represented Beacon Press and, subsequently, Senator Gravel in litigation that eventually went to the United States Supreme Court. I also conferred with my teacher and dear friend Alexander Bickel, who was lead counsel for the Times in the Pentagon Papers case. Our cases shared

to secure factual evidence that would demonstrate that the plea decisions made by the Government were improper or improperly influenced. 5 See, &g, Vicky Ward, The Talented Mr. Epstein, in Vanity Fair (Jan. 2005) (quoting Dershowitz as stating “I’m on my 2(th book. . .. The only person outside of my immedia

re improper or improperly influenced. 5 See, &g, Vicky Ward, The Talented Mr. Epstein, in Vanity Fair (J

al counsel in many high profile cases before I had the chance to work with him, including representing the Vice President of the United States before the United States Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore. And HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016201 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 6 of 6 while I did not kn