3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
12 / 3
Mentions
undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara
response consists of rambling generalizations about various areas of the law which have little or nothing to do with the issues actually raised by Epstein, and those sections of the response require no reply. In other portions, however, the government has ignored critical facts, mischaracterized or mis
target surfaces. In re Grand Jury Proceedings in Matter of Freeman, 708 F.2d 1571, 1574-75 (1 1 th Cir. 1983) (citing In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Jeffrey Fine), 641 F.2d 199, 201-03 (5th Cir. 1981)). See also In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 570 (1st Cir. 2001) ("Colorable claims of attorney-clien
AN & STUMPF, P.A., hereby appears as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in the above-entitled cause. DATED at Mi
nce of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for
States Attorney, hereby moves to seal this Motion, the United States' Surreply to the Replies of . William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein on Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas, and Supplement to Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas, for the follo
undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara
Accordin 1 , the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised by EFTA01728790 in footnote 3 of Intervenor Epstein's Reply, counsel asserts that, if "the Court were to sustain the government's standing objection as to Epstein, and would file a motion to quash
TES' PLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: ON TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS U
the computersthe items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authority
sistant United States Attorney, hereby moves to seal this Motion, the United States' Surreply to the Replies of . and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein on Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas, and Supplement to Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas, for the follo
oenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley 11 Black, Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00222950
y in connection with the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. 6. The United States respectfully requests per
d fairly in connection with the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. 6. The United States respectfully requ
ns of the subpoena and Order. in the pub this Motion, the United States' Surreply to the Replies of William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein on Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas, and Supplement to Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas, for the follo
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Motion to Quash Grand
Leon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
FedEx
ORGANIZATIONSouthern District
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
West Palm Beach
LOCATION
West Palm
LOCATION
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
Hunter Biden
PERSONSrebnick
PERSONResponse
ORGANIZATIONKornspan & Stumpf
ORGANIZATIONSupport of United States'
LOCATIONReplies
PERSON