Epstein Secrets

undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara

response consists of rambling generalizations about various areas of the law which have little or nothing to do with the issues actually raised by Epstein, and those sections of the response require no reply. In other portions, however, the government has ignored critical facts, mischaracterized or mis

target surfaces. In re Grand Jury Proceedings in Matter of Freeman, 708 F.2d 1571, 1574-75 (1 1 th Cir. 1983) (citing In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Jeffrey Fine), 641 F.2d 199, 201-03 (5th Cir. 1981)). See also In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 570 (1st Cir. 2001) ("Colorable claims of attorney-clien

AN & STUMPF, P.A., hereby appears as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in the above-entitled cause. DATED at Mi

nce of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for

ttorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida ssistant U S Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Telephone; Facsimile: Attorney for United States William I,

undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara

Accordin 1 , the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised by EFTA01728790 in footnote 3 of Intervenor Epstein's Reply, counsel asserts that, if "the Court were to sustain the government's standing objection as to Epstein, and would file a motion to quash

TES' PLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: ON TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS U

the computersthe items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authority

Federal Express on Attorneys William Richey and Roy Black. This document was not filed using CM/ECF because it is being filed under seal. ssistant U S Attorney EFTA01728803 4 SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

eeve and I'm a fact-checker with the news website The Daily Beast. We're running an article stating that the FBI has re-opened an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, that the investigation has been widened to include Epstein's associate Jean Luc Brunel plus Brunel's modelling agency, and that investigators are l

e're running an article stating that the FBI has re-opened an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, that the investigation has been widened to include Epstein's associate Jean Luc Brunel plus Brunel's modelling agency, and that investigators are looking for evidence of child trafficking. Would you be able

that the FBI has re-opened an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, that the investigation has been widened

Subject: RE: Request for Official Comment on an Investigation Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:03:41 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi - Thank you. Assistant U S Attorney West Palm Beach. FL3340 From: Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:34 PM To: Cc: Subject: FW: Request for Official Comment on an Investigation FYI