Epstein Secrets

tation cases. 2. In the Spring of 2006, Detective kith the Town of Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD") contacted me about the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution and his lewd and lascivious conduct with minors. The FBI opened a case file in July 2006, and I am

DOB a and I DOB Sgt "Illentered the room and explained that based on her own statements, she had implicated herself by bringing underage girls to Epsteins house. was aware of what she had stated and wished to assist further in hopes to receive a lesser charge . provided cellular telephone numbers for

he wanted to make money. She was told she would have to provide a massage and should make $200.00. thought about the offer and agreed to meet with Jeffrey. (Unknown last name) and MIII(Un known last name) picked her up and she was taken to Epstein's house. Upon her arrival to the house she was introdu

in the kitchen of the house. She was also introduced to a white female known to her as M. She was led upstairs to the main bedroom known to her as Jeff Epstein's bedroom . -arranged the massage table and covered the table with a sheet. She brought out the massage oils and laid them next to the massage bed. t

tigator William Riley and his firm, Riley Kiraly. Mr. Epstein is represented by undersigned counsel Roy Black.

, FL 33401. By: RO k LA K, SQ. Counsel for Je ey Epstein Black. Srebnick. Komspan & Shim 201 S. Biscayne

ITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS I. In its Surreply, the government, for the first time, after the parties have filed numerous pleadings directed to the enforceability of the challenged subpoena, anno

undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara

response consists of rambling generalizations about various areas of the law which have little or nothing to do with the issues actually raised by Epstein, and those sections of the response require no reply. In other portions, however, the government has ignored critical facts, mischaracterized or mis

target surfaces. In re Grand Jury Proceedings in Matter of Freeman, 708 F.2d 1571, 1574-75 (1 1 th Cir. 1983) (citing In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Jeffrey Fine), 641 F.2d 199, 201-03 (5th Cir. 1981)). See also In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 570 (1st Cir. 2001) ("Colorable claims of attorney-clien

AN & STUMPF, P.A., hereby appears as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in the above-entitled cause. DATED at Mi

nce of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for

IN RE: MOTION TO OUASII GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-

Riley's counsel, and it has been agreed that Mr. Riley will appear before the grand jury on September 18, 2007. However, in footnote 3 of Intervenor Epstein's Reply, counsel asserts that, if "the Court were to sustain the government's standing objection as to Epstein, Riley and Riley Kiraly would file a

ES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS

computers cx the items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. EFTA00211802 The grand jury probably h

EIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

nd through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Riley was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that

ited States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised by Mr. Riley. EFTA00222973 2. In the Reply filed by Intervenor Epstein, counsel asserts that "simple possession of the physical containers [the computers] is not the government's real object here. What the government a

ES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS

computers B the items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authorit

EIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-

Riley's counsel, and it has been agreed that Mr. Riley will appear before the grand jury on September 18, 2007. 2. In the Reply filed by Intervenor Epstein, counsel asserts that "simple possession of the physical containers [the computers] is not the government's real object here. What the government ac

ES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS

e computers — the items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authorit

EIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that lid not

office of I. counsel, and it has been agreed that 'Swill appear before the grand jury on September 18, 2007. However, in footnote 3 of Intervenor Epstein's Reply, counsel asserts that, if "the Court were to sustain the government's standing objection as to 'Witness did not file an initial motion to

PLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS M iND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS

computers B the items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authorit

EIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that was

undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara

Accordin 1 , the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised by EFTA01728790 in footnote 3 of Intervenor Epstein's Reply, counsel asserts that, if "the Court were to sustain the government's standing objection as to Epstein, and would file a motion to quash

TES' PLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: ON TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS U

the computersthe items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authority

PSTEIN RE: ON TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witnessi and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that wa