Epstein Secrets

hout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does #1 and #2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys did. Fi Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, many hours were spent trying to rev

NERS' "FACTS" WOULD HAVE VIOLATED FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) AND/OR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES. Several of the "facts" that Petitioners include allege that Epstein and others have committed crimes for which they were never charged or convicted. Others refer to matters that were occurring before the grand jury.

e opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys did. Fi Despite the Petition

tters occurring before the grand jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), the Government cannot confirm or deny the accuracy of those allegations. B. Due Process and the ABA Rule for Prosecutors As noted above, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigatio

ithout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does 1 and 2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, hours were spent tryin

NERS' "FACTS" WOULD HAVE VIOLATED FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) AND/OR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES. Several of the "facts" that Petitioners include allege that Epstein and others have committed crimes for which they were never charged or convicted. Others refer to matters that were occurring before the grand jury.

e opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite

tters occurring before the grand jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), the Government cannot confirm or deny the accuracy of those allegations. B. Due Process and the ABA Rule for Prosecutors As noted above, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigatio

ithout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does 1 and 2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, hours were spent tryin

NERS' "FACTS" WOULD HAVE VIOLATED FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) AND/OR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES. Several of the "facts" that Petitioners include allege that Epstein and others have committed crimes for which they were never charged or convicted. Others refer to matters that were occurring before the grand jury.

e opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite

tters occurring before the grand jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), the Government cannot confirm or deny the accuracy of those allegations. B. Due Process and the ABA Rule for Prosecutors As noted above, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigatio