Epstein Secrets

05/26/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-CV-21586-ASO PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S AMENDED NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT Plaintiff, Po

ered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010 Page 2 of 3 United States Attorney's Office informed him in a letter to his counsel that it was "concerned about Mr. Epstein's non-performance," and that the "delayed guilty plea and sentencing...[was] unacceptable to the [United States Attorney's] Office." See Letter date

hich must occur no later than December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Ajtomay By: Jeffrey . Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafana 2This is contingent, h

tter to his counsel that it was "concerned about Mr. Epstein's non-performance," and that the "delayed guilty

s motion contesting liability. See Transcript of Hearing before The Honorable Kenneth Marra, dated June 17, 2009, excerpts of which are attached to this Response as Exhibit 2. And, finally, this pattern of delay and non-performance is evident by his actions in this case. Despite months and months of refusing to pay Plain

05/26/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-CV-21586-ASO PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S AMENDED NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT Plaintiff, Po

ered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010 Page 2 of 3 United States Attorney's Office informed him in a letter to his counsel that it was "concerned about Mr. Epstein's non-performance," and that the "delayed guilty plea and sentencing...[was] unacceptable to the [United States Attorney's] Office." See Letter date

hich must occur no later than December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Ajtomay By: Jeffrey . Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafana 2This is contingent, h

tter to his counsel that it was "concerned about Mr. Epstein's non-performance," and that the "delayed guilty

s motion contesting liability. See Transcript of Hearing before The Honorable Kenneth Marra, dated June 17, 2009, excerpts of which are attached to this Response as Exhibit 2. And, finally, this pattern of delay and non-performance is evident by his actions in this case. Despite months and months of refusing to pay Plain

5/26/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-CV-21586-ASG PODI{URST ORSECK, P.A. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S AMENDED NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT Plaintiff, Po

ered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010 Page 2 of 3 United States Attorney's Office informed him in a letter to his counsel that it was "concerned about Mr. Epstein's non-performance," and that the "delayed guilty plea and sentencing...[was] unacceptable to the [United States Attorney's] Office." See Letter date

586-ASG PODI{URST ORSECK, P.A. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEF

tter to his counsel that it was "concerned about Mr. Epstein's non-performance," and that the "delayed guilty

s motion contesting liability. See Transcript of Hearing before The Honorable Kenneth Marra, dated June 17, 2009, excerpts of which are attached to this Response as Exhibit 2. And, finally, this pattern of delay and non-performance is evident by his actions in this case. Despite months and months of refusing to pay Plain