Epstein Secrets

ctims" and given our understanding that Ms. as well was one of those who is also on the list of persons the Utivernment contends were Mc MIN of Mr. Epstein's alleged violation of federal law, we have a principled concern about adopting your recommended language which would leave Mr. Epstein without a b

ND AITILIATLD PAVINIItSHIPS Citigroup Canter 153 Elam 53rd SWIM New York, Now 'font 10022.4811 ass.saoo www.hlrilsnd.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jefflay Epstein For the purpose of enforcing the rights enumerated in article 1.13, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commis

istration of criminal justice with profound consequences beyond the resolution in the matter at hand. • in a precedent-shattering investigation of Jeffrey Epstrein that raises important policy questions—and serious issues as to the fair and honorable enforcement of federal law—the USA.° in Miami is considering

ion that no telephonic or Internet persuasion, inducement, enticement or coercion of a minor, or of any other individual, occurred. In addition, Mr. Jeffrey Harmful. the former law partner of one of the federal prosecutors involved in this matter and die attorney for most of the civil complainants (as d

f persons the Utivernment contends were Mc MIN of Mr. Epstein's alleged violation of federal law, we have a pr

umerated in article 1.13, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is cbarged in Federal district cowl. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or • C

PS Cinema Cantor 163 Ent SSW Street New York, New York 10022-1411 Facsimile: (M 446.4800 le 446-4000 vnicklitlend.com December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our po

now, we believe we have shown that at least some (if not all) of the identified individuals did not suffer any injury at all in connection with Mr. Epstein's alleged conduct.' in addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification must be balanced against a w action that may impinge on Mr. Ep

46-4000 vnicklitlend.com December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you pos

balanced against a w action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney General Guide

numerated in article 1.9, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or Chi

Jeffrey Epstein had been charged by the State of Florida with solicitation of prostitution, a violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.07. State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006-CF-009495AXXXMB (Palm Beach Cty, Fla.). In the summer of 2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office, seeking a

were gathered as part of the Grand Jury investigation. As the investigation progressed, Jane Doe 2's identity became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to

initiate an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein, and his personal assistants, had induced

retion should he authorize federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein." Epstein's attorneys then sought additional rev

.S.C. § 3771(a)(1) — (8), "a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." At no time was Epstein ever charged with an offense in Federal district

, Jeffrey Epstein had been charged by the State of Florida with solicitation of prostitution, a violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.07. State of Florida'. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006-CF-009495AXXXMB (Palm Beach Cty, Fla.). In the summer of 2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office, seeking a

were gathered as part of the Grand Jury investigation. As the investigation progressed, Jane Doe 2's identity became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to

initiate an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein, and his personal assistants, had induced

retion should he authorize federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein." Epstein's attorneys then sought additional rev

.S.C. § 3771(a)(1) — (8), "a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." At no time was Epstein ever charged with an offense in Federal district

132 Dear Alex: AND Anmann rosTmiunos Coagroup Cellar 159 East WO 94teot Now York, Slow Van 10022.4611 www.kirkioncl.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our po

's alleged conduct.' in addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification roust be balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Guidelines clearly call into question the wisdom and practicality of giving notice" to a "possible u i

2.4611 www.kirkioncl.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you pos

balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Gui

enumerated in article LB, a victim is 'a person directly and pmsimately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense cc an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if thc offense is charted in Federal district court. If a victim is undis 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or Chi

33132 Dear Alex: AND AntiAnn rioninains Cola/cup Cara/ 159 East San Snot New York, Now Van 10022.4611 www.kirkiond.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our po

's alleged conduct.' in addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification roust be balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Guidelines clearly call into question the wisdom and practicality of giving notice" to a "possible u i

22.4611 www.kirkiond.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you pos

balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Gui

numerated in article 1.B, a victim is 'a penion directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense cc an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charted in Federal district court. If a victim is undo 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or Chic

132 Dear Alex: AND Anmann riormiuroos Calgroup Cantor 159 East Said S0441 New York, Now Van 10022.4611 www.kirldend.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our po

's alleged conduct.' in addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification roust be balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Guidelines clearly call into question the wisdom and practicality of giving notice" to a "possible u i

22.4611 www.kirldend.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you pos

balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Gui

numerated in article 1.B, a victim is 'a penion directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense cc an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charted in Federal district court. If a victim is undo 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or Chic

le R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: Facsimile: I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a

now, we believe we have shown that at least some (if not all) of the identified individuals did not suffer any injury at all in connection with Mr. Epstein's alleged conduct.' In addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification must be balanced against any action that may impinge on Mr. Ep

f Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: Facsimile: I write to addre

balanced against any action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney General Guide

numerated in article I.B, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charted in Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or Chi

sponse to Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. JANE DOE 2 CLEARLY EXPRESSED HER DESIRE NOT TO BE TREATED AS A VICTIM OF EPSTEIN During the Government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, Jane Doe 2 expressed her clear and unequivocal desire not to be treated as a vi

as a victim of his conduct. 22. The Plaintiff is included in the list of victims identified by the Federal Government as victims of the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's illegal conduct. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is thus estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal Government from denying the acts alleged

did not want underage girls providing him massages. D.E. 403-3 at 9. She lamented that Epstein was the subject of a criminal investigation: I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it would really be a shame. It's a shame that he has to go through this because he's an

e sole issue before the Circuit Court was whether defendant Epstein was entering pleas of guilty that were voluntary

numerated in article 1.B, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Petitioners contend the Guidelines did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's

sponse to Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. JANE DOE 2 CLEARLY EXPRESSED HER DESIRE NOT TO BE TREATED AS A VICTIM OF EPSTEIN During the Government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, Jane Doe 2 expressed her clear and unequivocal desire not to be treated as a vi

as a victim of his conduct. 22. The Plaintiff is included in the list of victims identified by the Federal Government as victims of the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's illegal conduct. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is thus estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal Government from denying the acts alleged

did not want underage girls providing him massages. D.E. 403-3 at 9. She lamented that Epstein was the subject of a criminal investigation: I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it would really be a shame. It's a shame that he has to go through this because he's an

e sole issue before the Circuit Court was whether defendant Epstein was entering pleas of guilty that were voluntary

numerated in article 1.B, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Petitioners contend the Guidelines did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's