Epstein Secrets

IL/ I I/ 4VVI II . KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AtIlLIATIM Honorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney Re: Jeffrey Fastein Dear Alex: vnvw.kiaklunU.CCun December 17, 2007 IL UV'S/ I IU Thank you for meeting with us on Friday, December 14. 2007. The meeting demonstr

emonstrated significant agreement un broad issues of policy. We all agree on the centrality of the principle of horizontal equality, namely that Mr. Epstein should be treated no differently • - neither more nor less favorably — than a less prominent or less wealthy detimdant accused of similar conduct. W

01 s testimony establishing each of these pivotal points are set forth below: • Consent Q: Okay. When did you meet him and who introduced you to Jeffrey? A: My girlfriend introduced me to Jeffrey.* (M• Sworn Statement at 5- 6) Q: Now you said thatMitold you that he likes massages. Did she elaborate

the principle of horizontal equality, namely that Mr. Epstein should be treated no differently • - neither more

of differing constructions.' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. 775.021(1) (1995); Perkins v. State. 576 80.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan v. State, 666 So.2d 260.261 (Flu. 4th DCA 1996)). • Plain Meatninzt

e R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: (213) 680-8400 www.ldrkland.com December 17, 2007 Facsimile: (213) 680.8500 Thank you for meeting with us on Friday, December 14, 2

emonstrated significant agreement on broad issues of policy. We all agree on the centrality of the principle of horizontal equality, namely that MI. Epstein should be treated no differently — neither more nor less favorably — than a less prominent or less wealthy defendant accused of similar conduct. We

f Ms. testimony establishing each of these pivotal points are set forth below: • Consent Q: Okay. When did you meet him and who introduced you to Jeffrey? A: My girlfriend, introduced me to Jeffrey.* ( Sworn Statement at 5- 6) ** * * * Q: Now you said that I. told you that he likes massages. Did

persuaded that this provides the only avenue for Mr. Epstein to be afforded the bedrock value of horizontal eq

of differing constructions,' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. § 6 As we have made clear throughout this investigation, the alleged conduct does not implicate over-arching federal interests because the conduc

emonstrated significant agreement on broad issues or policy. We all agree on the centrality of the principle of horizontal equality. namely that Mr. Epstein should be treated no differently • - neither more nor less favorably — than a less prominent or less wealthy defendant accused of similar conduct. W

f Ms. testimony establishing each of these pivotal points arc set forth below: • Consent 0: Okay. When did you meet him and who introduced you to Jeffrey? A: My girlfriend. (r) introduced me to Jelirey.$ Sworn Statement al - 9: Now you said that old you that he likes massages. Did she elaborate o

demonstrating that the reach of § 2422(h) being advanced by your Office in this matter is unprecedented. Attempts by CMS to match the facts of Mr. F.pstein's conduct with any prior ease — reported or otherwise -- generated a single distinguishable precedent that had no relationship to the facts under c

the principle of horizontal equality. namely that Mr. Epstein should be treated no differently • - neither more

of differing constructions.' due pn'ccss requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (riling F. Stat. 775.021( I ) (1995): Perkins it State, 576 So.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan it State, 666 So.2d 260. 261 (Fla. 4th ocA 1996)). • Plain Meaning