Epstein Secrets

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

Y. 1655 Pike DeleePh.„,.. .ML lt Fst!ii!lefleach, IR. »CI 1 0 C) Par 1 sprat your tether rear*, taw fifty sullierdoller 2 leoseit arrest Jeffrey ipater says that pH, lir with 3 your aunt and tale ad bar bra liar trots le that I Cerrees7 S Us. 6 0. Iles ray have you bra lira with P

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of hi s obligations pursuant to th

have prepared documents to charge at least one of Mr. Epstein's lady friends in state court. If they can push

thei't NW ass. sir. O. 00 yea know who Doff fey Slow NI A. N. Pie. 0. Clo yet hew who J'effroy Mnia 14/ A. 0. That.. the layer who flest and Spytein os ynr nYlf. tleht7 500•11 au In. Noun •Pmetted piet hally any M. LIN101.0i hey coriertetlere that ~et had with At. Soso 'Nordin.; Not Issue. y

pstein has asked the Court -11- EFTA00185216 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 12 of 17 Unlike Wright and Incendy, Epstein also has not been criminally indicted. In some districts, this alone is virtually dispositive. See, e.g., Sterling Nall Bank'. A-I Hotels Internal

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

spondence or oral communications between the parties in these civil suits. Based on the information presented by the Court and a review of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Court

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

in has asked the Court -11- EFTA00222215 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 12 of 17 Unlike Wright and Incendy, Epstein also has not been criminally indicted. In some districts, this alone is virtually dispositive. See, e.g., Sterling Nat'l Bank'. A-1 Hotels haernat'

spondence or oral communications between the parties in these civil suits. Based on the information presented by the Court and a review of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Court

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

money from the defendant. In the context of some of the civil suits currently pending, Epstein has asked the Court EFTA00222771 Unlike Wright and Incendy, Epstein also has not been criminally indicted. In some districts, this alone is virtually dispositive. See, e.g., Sterling Nat'l Bank'. A-1 Hotels Internat

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ("NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

n has asked the Court -11- EFTA00602063 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121 Entered on F LSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 12 of 17 Unlike Wright and Incendy, Epstein also has not been criminally indicted. In some districts, this alone is virtually dispositive. See, e.g., Sterling Nat'l Bank v. A-1 Hotels Interna

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance ofhis obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO

in has asked the Court -11- EFTA00599152 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 12 of 17 Unlike Wright and Incendy, Epstein also has not been criminally indicted. In some districts, this alone is virtually dispositive. See, e.g., Sterling Nat'l Bank v. A-I Hotels Interna