Epstein Secrets

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

spondence or oral communications between the parties in these civil suits. Based on the information presented by the Court and a review of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Court

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

r there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "`to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice.'" Securites and Exchange Comm' n I. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 1996) (quoting S.E.C.I First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (a

spondence or oral communications between the parties in these civil suits. Based on the information presented by the Court and a review of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Court

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

r there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "`to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice.'" Securites and Exchange Comm'n I. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 1996) (quoting S.E.C.I First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ("NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

her there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice." Securites and Exchange Comm 'n v. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 19%) (quoting S.E.C. v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (