5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
28 / 5
Mentions
office. I informed her that I wanted to get copies of the sworn statements our clients gave to FBI investigators during the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, and that I needed instructions from her as to the proper procedure. 3. Ms. Moore informed me that it was a three-step process: First, I should ser
ein To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find federal subpoenas for the sworn statements of several witnesses taken during the investigation of Jeffrey Edward Epstein between approximately 2006 and 2007. The statements we seek are those given to the FBI by our clients, each of whom has brought suit as a Jane Doe
3/22/2010 EFTA00128715 JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEF•Y EPSTEIN Page 1 of 1 ' JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEI
/2010 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEM, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-8109
, FL 33169 aat":6926E.-."09 C007 LIMNS esPN 02 1P $ 000.61 ° 0003952374 MAR 17 2010 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 33160 EFTA00128728 Jane Doe 2-7 vs. Jeffrey Eplin Page 1 of 1 Jane Doe 2-7 vs. Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:01 PM To: (USAFLS) Good afternoon I= I spoke with she made me
tance. Parale al Sec., FBI https://www.324mail.corn/owanae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAAAJ2YReGj4eTp5Q... 3/22/2010 EFTA00128715 JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEF•Y EPSTEIN Page 1 of 1 ' JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:25 AM To: (USAFLS) Good morning U, I just received a copy of
investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motio
orth Miami Beach, FL 33169 Re: Jane Does 2-7 v. Jeffrey stein To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please
STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Jessica Arbour deposes and states as follows: 1. My name is Jessica Arbour. I am an attorney at Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A., the law firm representing Jane Doe Nos. 2-7. 2. On or about March 12, 2010, I spoke with FBI Paralegal Specialist Deborah Moore at the FBI's Nor
August 4, 2009 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Jeffrey Epstein/B.B. — Requested Disclosure of Non-Prosecution Agreement Dear Mr. Kuvin: Thank you for your letter regarding the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agree
ter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein's counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Dismiss was not a
's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 voswidrkland.com June 15, 2009 Re: Jay Epstein Dear a I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ez
Atkinson, Esq. EFTA00183762 J. WHAM. BURMAN, PA., GREGORY W.CCU:NAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON. IR., PA., BERNARD LEBEDBKER MARK T. I II/STIER, PA. JEFFREY PEPIN MIOIAEL PIKE HEATHER McNAMARA RUDA I R.ORIDA WARD anima CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNER
8 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defend
, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. www.kirklend.com June 12, 200
d therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement
stein's violation of 18 §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. 33. Plaintiff hired Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. (ffIda Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.), in this matter and agreed to pay them a reasonable attorneys' fee. • WHEREFORE, Plaintiff.. Doe No. 6 demands j
August 4, 2009 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Jeffrey Epstein/B.B. — Requested Disclosure of Non-Prosecution Agreement Dear Mr. Kuvin: Thank you for your letter regarding the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agree
ter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein's counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Dismiss was not a
tatement [DE 29] dated May 26, 2009. Counsel for Defendant EPSTEIN Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a
, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana, M www.kirkland.com
d therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement
tion against Jeffrey Epstein styled B.B.I. Jeffi-ey Epstein, case no.: 502008CA037319 MB AB. We are hereby r
s violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. 33. Plaintiff hired Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. (filda Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.), in this matter and agreed to pay them a reasonable attorneys' fee. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 6 demands
010 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. --------------~/ Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656,
09-80802, 09-81092 ______________ ___:! EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO JANE DOE #3'S RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), submits this Reply to Plaintiffs, Jane Doe #3, Response to Epstein's Motion for Sanctions and states: I. On January 13, 2010, Epstein filed a M
chael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 Attorneys for Defendant Epstein Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a
1 [email protected] Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully submitted, By: Isl Michae
Foundation is not listed on the building's directory, neither is Jessica Arbour, counsel who attended the subject IME, listed as an attorney on the Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. (M&H) website. Attached as Exhibit A is the "Attorneys" section of the M&H website, which noticeably fails to list Ms. Arbour. In addition, Ms. Ar
305-9312200 Herman &Mermelsteln, P 03:04:45p.m. 02-04-2010 7/15 Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 6 11. Please identify your five closest friends for the years 2006 — 2010, including their full name, current address, home telephone number
hile still a minor, Jane Doe No. 2 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by Jane Doe No. 3 wherein she was sexuall
intend to call at trial other females who went to Mr. Epstein's residence? If so, please identify each individ
f the witnesses she intends to call at trial. The witnesses who went to Epstein's residence include: Jane Doe No. 2 Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A., While still a minor, Jane Doe No. 2 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by Jane Doe No. 3 wherein she was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epst
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
Leon Black
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONJack Goldberger
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONMaria Farmer
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Katy Perry
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONRoy Black
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON