Epstein Secrets

hout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does #1 and #2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys did. Fi Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, many hours were spent trying to rev

NERS' "FACTS" WOULD HAVE VIOLATED FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) AND/OR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES. Several of the "facts" that Petitioners include allege that Epstein and others have committed crimes for which they were never charged or convicted. Others refer to matters that were occurring before the grand jury.

e opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys did. Fi Despite the Petition

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further

ithout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does 1 and 2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, hours were spent tryin

NERS' "FACTS" WOULD HAVE VIOLATED FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) AND/OR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES. Several of the "facts" that Petitioners include allege that Epstein and others have committed crimes for which they were never charged or convicted. Others refer to matters that were occurring before the grand jury.

e opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further

ithout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does 1 and 2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, hours were spent tryin

NERS' "FACTS" WOULD HAVE VIOLATED FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) AND/OR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES. Several of the "facts" that Petitioners include allege that Epstein and others have committed crimes for which they were never charged or convicted. Others refer to matters that were occurring before the grand jury.

e opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys were allowed to do. F Despite

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further