Epstein Secrets

EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's

vi EFTA00792349 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration Act (SORA), Cor

EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's

035 EFTA00181036 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration Act (SORA), Cor

LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's

71st Street New York, NY 10021 Ind.# Risk Level 30129-2010 Three (3) Respectfully yours. F. Haiwick, SCC Correspondence Unit Supreme Court, Criminal Term E EFTA00231524 A79 N''' PE SI GpEFICER 44: %.'14% • -SOPERMSIIN.A4040Yi• ONE; 6FFErtiDgii-P-UIIS PERMS •, Fr . • t; 4 renceiHHI 11;idus

EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's

71st Street New York, NY 10C21 Ind.# Risk Level 30129-2010 Three (3) Respectfully yours, F. Halwick, SCC Correspondence Unit Supreme Court, Criminal Term EFTA00232644 A79 ."'•':; 1;4: . • -tlri t -" qNoNE;OFFENDEA IS.UN P.EFtyISE • kv A . • :4•N,. • n• The •. Crefsysnisild• tebitIn