o A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, R. Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafana to J. Lefkowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black m interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Lefkowit

A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, R. Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafafia to J. Leflcowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black re interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Leflc

o A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, R. Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafafia to J. Lefkowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black re interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Lefkow

e case background and upcoming meetings in preparation for SORA hearing. 9/17/10 .50 Matthew 0 Solum Telephone conference with J. Lefkowitz and M. Weinberg re Reporting Outline Issues. 9/21/10 1.00 Sandra L Musumeci Review and analyze memorandum and materials re SORA calculation. 9/21/10 2.50 Jay P

case background and upcoming meetings in preparation for SORA hearing. 9/17/10 Matthew 0 Solum .50 Telephone conference with J. Lefkowitz and M. Weinberg re Reporting Outline Issues. 9/21/10 Sandra L Musumeci 1.00 Review and analyze memorandum and materials re SORA calculation. 9/21/10 Jay P Lefk

pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).' Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he ha

register under SORA, despite not being a resident of New York, because of his ownership of a secondary property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, dated Aug. 16, 2010). Shortly thereafter, Appellant's counsel submitted a letter to the Board outlining

Motion seeking permission to take J. Epstein's limited deposition and B. Edwards' proposed Order, work on edits to same; follow up with D. Indyke, M. Weinberg and J. Goldberger 05/26/18 SJL Communications with D. Indyke; work on Motion to 2.50 1,875.00 Strike Intervenors' List of Requested Relief 05/2

m to register under SORA, despite not being a resident of New York, given his ownership of a secondary property in Manhattan.2 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, dated Aug. 16, 2010). Shortly thereafter, in response, Appellant's counsel submitted a letter to the Bo

ceptance of Summons and Complaint; 0.30 hr $150.00 Summons and Complaint on Doe 101 v. Epstein 04/20/2009 RHB Review e-mail correspondence from M. Weinberg re: CMA reply to Motion to 0.10 hr $30.00 Dismiss 04/20/2009 RHB Review case law referenced In M. Weinberg e-mail, rule of levity 0.40 hr $12

e To: Review Project Our Matter No. 0510.1501 Invoice #12382 Professional Services February 2016 Hrs/Rate Amount 2/28/2016 Correspondence with M. Weinberg and other counsel; review memorandum 2.25 1,462.50 and prior correspondence; update legal research. 650.00/hr Gregory L. Poe For professional s

e To: Review Project Our Matter No. 0510.1501 Invoice #12382 Professional Services February 2016 Hrs/Rate Amount 2/28/2016 Correspondence with M. Weinberg and other counsel; review memorandum 2.25 1,462.50 and prior correspondence; update legal research. 650.00/hr Gregory L. Poe For professional s

m to register under SORA, despite not being a resident of New York, given his ownership of a secondary property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, dated Aug. 16, 2010). Shortly thereafter, Appellant's counsel submitted a letter to the Board outlining

pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has

pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has

A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, IL Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafafla to J. Lefkowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black re interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Lefkow

opist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has