Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]
t's SORA determination, made in the express absence of clear and convincing evidence, 18 constituted an abuse of discretion, warranting reversal of the Court's Level 3 determination and Order. Moreover, given the Court's demonstrated lack of judicial objectivity toward Appellant, should remand be required, Appell
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]
t's SORA determination, made in the express absence of clear and convincing evidence, 18 constituted an abuse of discretion, warranting reversal of the Court's Level 3 determination and Order. Moreover, given the Court's demonstrated lack of judicial objectivity toward Appellant, should remand be required, Appell
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]
t's SORA determination, made in the express absence of clear and convincing evidence, 18 constituted an abuse of discretion, warranting reversal of the Court's Level 3 determination and Order. Moreover, given the Court's demonstrated lack of judicial objectivity toward Appellant, should remand be required, Appell
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (76)
Entities connected to both Rampino and the Court's Level 3
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5 w/ Rampino·4 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION5 w/ Rampino·4 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON5 w/ Rampino·4 w/ the
Appellant
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rampino·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON4 w/ Rampino·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rampino·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON5 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
New York
LOCATION5 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
People's
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON4 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
Fresh Del
LOCATION4 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
Criminal Justice Services'
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Rampino·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON4 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
the State of New York
LOCATION4 w/ Rampino·2 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON4 w/ Rampino·2 w/ the
EC
Eastbrook Caribe
PERSON4 w/ Rampino·2 w/ the
SM
Sandra Lynn Musumeci
PERSON3 w/ Rampino·3 w/ the
MW
M. Weinberg
PERSON4 w/ Rampino·2 w/ the
Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rampino·2 w/ the