rious dates, zip loch bag receipts 495.63 Payment to Berryhill 157.50 5,000.00 Payment to "Pablo" Paul Schack 54.48 67.50 276.57 Paid out by Rampino, repairs, supplies, zip lock bags 48.62 4,581.06 4,598.72 6/2/2007 Pablo Ft. Laud to Myrtle Beach 133.40 5/29/2007 Pablo STT to Ft. Laud 174.6

er Diem Cars, gas, taxi, misc Hotels Airfare Vessel Prep Vessel Supplies & Small Equip Delivery Fees Dates Description Meals 4/18/2007 Rampino to Ireland Yard Pre Buy # 1 5/8/2007 Rampino to Ireland Yard Pre Buy # 2 zip lock bag with receipts 2,479.91 76.33 214.01 160.28 123.34 1,060

of the matter to a different Justice should this Court deem remand necessary to recalculate Appellant's risk assessment level. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008); Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V. u. Eastbrook Caribe, 40 A.D.3d 415, 421 (1st Dep't 2007). 30 EFTA00792603 CON

38 AM To: Emad Hanna Subject: BERTHA delivery Good morning, Bought tickets kast night as flight prices were climbing as I was booking. Cost foe Rampino, Weir and Berryhill STT to Norfolk is $ 3,100.00. emad, I will have fuel, tools equipment supplies and unforseen. I believe I would not be presumpt

ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]

ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]

ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]

ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]