Epstein Secrets

EIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

ge on a document by document basis explaining how the production of that document would tend to incriminate the target. See, e.g., United States v. Grable , 98 F.3d 251, 255, 257 (6 di Cir. 1996) ("The existence of `substantial and real hazards of self-incrimination' is a prerequisite to the proper ass

PSTEIN RE: ON TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witnessi and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that wa

tem called for in the subpoena." (Epstein Reply at 6.) -2- EFTA01728791 document would tend to incriminate the target. See, e.g., United States v. Grable, 98 F.3d 251, 255, 257 (6 h Cir. 1996) ("The existence of `substantial and real hazards of self-incrimination' is a prerequisite to the proper asse

IN RE: MOTION TO OUASII GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

tem called for in the subpoena." (Epstein Reply at 6.) -2- EFTA00179087 document would tend to incriminate the target. See, e.g., United States v. Grable, 98 F.3d 251, 255, 257 (6 11' Cir. 1996) ("The existence of `substantial and real hazards of self-incrimination' is a prerequisite to the proper as