Epstein Secrets

TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Ri

allow Court to conduct in camera inspection to determine whether act of production privilege applied); United States v. Bell ,a 217 F.R.D. 335, 339 (M.D. Pa. 2003) (Although voluntarily created documents are not protected by the Fifth Amendment, an act of production privilege can be asserted, but only when "i

TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that was excused from

allow Court to conduct in camera inspection to determine whether act of production privilege applied); United States I. Be11,3 217 F.R.D. 335, 339 (M.D. Pa. 2003) (Although voluntarily created documents are not protected by the Fifth Amendment, an act of production privilege can be asserted, but only when "i

TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witnessi and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that was excused from

allow Court to conduct in camera inspection to determine whether act of production privilege applied); United States v. Be11,3 217 F.R.D. 335, 339 (M.D. Pa. 2003) (Although voluntarily created documents are not protected by the Fifth Amendment, an act of production privilege can be asserted, but only when "it

O OUASII GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Ri

allow Court to conduct in camera inspection to determine whether act of production privilege applied); United States v. Bell; 217 F.R.D. 335, 339 (M.D. Pa. 2003) (Although voluntarily created documents are not protected by the Fifth Amendment, an act of production privilege can.be asserted, but only when "it