Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d); see, e.g., id. § 3771(d)(3) (requiring district court to "take up and decide any motion asserting a victim's right forthwith"); United States v. Aguirre-Gonzalez, 597 F.3d 46, 55 (1st Cir. 2010) ("The CVRA plainly envisions that crime victims' petitions challenging a denial of their rights will be taken up a
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d); see, e.g., id. § 3771(d)(3) (requiring district court to "take up and decide any motion asserting a victim's right forthwith"); United States v. Aguirre-Gonzalez, 597 F.3d 46, 55 (1st Cir. 2010) ("The CVRA plainly envisions that crime victims' petitions challenging a denial of their rights will be taken up a
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d); see, e.g., id. § 3771(d)(3) (requiring district court to "take up and decide any motion asserting a victim's right forthwith"); United States v. Aguirre-Gonzalez, 597 F.3d 46, 55 (1st Cir. 2010) ("The CVRA plainly envisions that crime victims' petitions challenging a denial of their rights will be taken up a
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both Aguirre-Gonzalez and v. Lir Joe Records
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON33 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON27 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
United States
LOCATION27 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
Paul Cassell
PERSON25 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON24 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON24 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON20 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
RU
Rubin
PERSON19 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
the Southern District
LOCATION15 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION14 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
JE
James Eisenberg
PERSON13 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON13 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
West Palm Beach
LOCATION13 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
Weissing
PERSON12 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·2 w/ v.
SA
Santobello
PERSON11 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
W.R. Huff
PERSON10 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
George W. Bush
PERSON10 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.
Moussaoui
PERSON9 w/ Aguirre-Gonzalez·3 w/ v.