Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).' Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he ha
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
opist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both M. Weinberg and the Facts Cited Therein
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ M.·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON17 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON13 w/ M.·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON10 w/ M.·4 w/ the
New York
LOCATION9 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON9 w/ M.·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON8 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON8 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Criminal Term
ORGANIZATION7 w/ M.·4 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION7 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Appellant
ORGANIZATION7 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Pataki
PERSON6 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ M.·4 w/ the
JR
Joe Recarey
PERSON7 w/ M.·3 w/ the
Adriana Ross
PERSON6 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Felony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATION6 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Kings Cty
LOCATION5 w/ M.·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ M.·4 w/ the
EC
Eastbrook Caribe
PERSON5 w/ M.·4 w/ the
New York State Bd
ORGANIZATION5 w/ M.·4 w/ the