Epstein Secrets

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

DAY OF SHARON R. BOCK FRK By DER11 CLERK Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard - Suite 250 Jacksonville, Telephone: Facsimile: By: Brad Edwards Florida Bar #542075 Page 17 of 17 EFTA00799563 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Ent

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

AY OF  SHARON R. BOCK CLERK By OEM CLERK Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard - Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Telephone: 904-680-1234 Facsimile: 904-680-1238 By: Brad Edwards Florida Bar #542075 Page 17 of 17 EFTA00081084

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

ite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar JAY HOWEEL SSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard - Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Telephone: Facsimile: By: Brad Edwards Florida Bares Page 17 of 17 EFTA00208891 Exhibit C EFTA00208892 IN THE