Epstein Secrets

t Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Stan: I write in response to your letter ofNovember 28, 2007, to Assistant Attorney General Fisher. There are a number of issues that must be addressed, but I believe that a history of the negotiations with the various counsel for Mr. Epstein wou

espite the fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Stan: I write in response to your letter of November 28, 2007, to Assistant Attorney General Fisher. There are a number of issues that must be addressed, but I believe that a history of the negotiations with the various counsel for Mr. Epstein wou

fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA Villafafia and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

y representative, and not from the Government, to avoid any bias. As you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take pl

fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA Villafafia and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even