Epstein Secrets

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

to suppress or to dismiss the indictment in that criminal action. See, e.g., United States, ex. rel. Westrick v. Second Chance, 2007 WL 1020808 *4 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2007) (Defendant in civil False Claims Act suit moved to stay civil action pending criminal -10- EFTA00602062 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121 En

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

ion to suppress or to dismiss the indictment in that criminal action. See, e.g., United States, ex. reL Westrickl Second Chance, 2007 WL 1020808 *4 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2007) (Defendant in civil False Claims Act suit moved to stay civil action pending criminal -10- EFTA00222214 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121 En

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In tr Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

on to suppress or to dismiss the indictment in that criminal action. See, e.g., United States, ex. rel. Westrickl Second Chance, 2007 WL 1020808 *4 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2007) (Defendant in civil False Claims Act suit moved to stay civil action pending criminal -10- EFTA00222770 investigation where no indictment had be

e adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. ( See In re Jane Doe Litigation , Court File No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

to suppress or to dismiss the indictment in that criminal action. See, e.g., United States, ex. rel. Westrick. Second Chance , 2007 WL 1020808 *4 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2007) (Defendant in civil False Claims Act suit moved to stay civil action pending criminal investigation where no indictment had been returned. The dist

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

to suppress or to dismiss the indictment in that criminal action. See, e.g., United States, ex. rel. Westrick v. Second Chance, 2007 WL 1020808 *4 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2007) (Defendant in civil False Claims Act suit moved to stay civil action pending criminal -10- EFTA00599151 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121 En

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Cil- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

n to suppress or to dismiss the indictment in that criminal action. See, e.g., United States, ex. rel. Westrickl. Second Chance, 2007 WL 1020808 '4 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2007) (Defendant in civil False Claims Act suit moved to stay civil action pending criminal -10- EFTA00185215 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 21 Enter