Epstein Secrets

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

her there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice." Securites and Exchange Comm 'n v. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 19%) (quoting S.E.C. v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

r there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "`to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice.'" Securites and Exchange Comm' n I. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 1996) (quoting S.E.C.I First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (a

re adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In tr Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discover

r there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "`to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice.'" Securites and Exchange Comm'n I. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 1996) (quoting S.E.C.I First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (