Epstein Secrets

elf incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.'" Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. FL 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions is well-settled in

her there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice." Securites and Exchange Comm 'n v. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 19%) (quoting S.E.C. v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (

f self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co.l Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regardini stays of civil actions is well-settled i

r there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "`to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice.'" Securites and Exchange Comm' n I. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 1996) (quoting S.E.C.I First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (a

f self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co.l Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regardini stays of civil actions is well-settled i

r there are "special circumstances" warranting the imposition of a stay "`to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice.'" Securites and Exchange Comm'n I. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. Fl. 1996) (quoting S.E.C.I First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (