Epstein Secrets

end their petition to reflect that a non-prosecution agreement was negotiated in September 2007. DATED: February 23, 2015 Respectfully submitted, WILFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 23, 2015, I electronically filed the f

n letter to me. This was the first written communication I had received from the FBI. The letter was attached as Exhibit 1 to my earlier statement." D.E. 310- 1, ¶ 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Offi

ion to reflect that a non-prosecution agreement was negotiated in September 2007. 19 EFTA00210638 DATED: February 2015 Respectfully submitted, WILFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 2015, I electronically filed the fore

FBI's investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. She told S/A Slater that she did not want to be bothered about the Epstein matter again. D.E. 304-1, ¶ 7 and D.E. 290-3 at 17-18. In their motion, petitioners claim that the facts surrounding this exchange are highly disputed, when they are not. D.E. 311 at 16

nt to the petition is futile since the claim is subject to dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). DATED: January 20, 2015 Respectfully submitted, WILFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 20, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Cle

ates: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. I). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergenc