3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
for attorneys not to do precisely what Hickman I. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to encourage
ld ever, arguendo, be deemed relevant to 17 EFTA00205376 plaintiffs' action against the government for alleged breaches of their rights under the CVRA,3 a dubious proposition at best, any such relevance could be no more than tangential. Plaintiffs already know full well what the government did or di
for attorneys not to do precisely what Hickman I. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to encourage
ld ever, arguendo, be deemed relevant to 17 EFTA00205356 plaintiffs' action against the government for alleged breaches of their rights under the CVRA,3 a dubious proposition at best, any such relevance could be no more than tangential. Plaintiffs already know full well what the government did or di
likelihood that the Eleventh Circuit will agree. Indeed, the Court's opinion creates an incentive for attorneys not to do precisely what Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to encourage attorneys to do: reduce facts, ideas, and opinions to writing. A return to the days of settlement/p
nt negotiations could ever, arguendo, be deemed relevant to plaintiffs' action against the government for alleged breaches of their rights under the CVRA,3 a dubious proposition at best, any such relevance could be no more than tangential. Plaintiffs already know full well what the government did or di
Entities connected to both Emmy Taylor and CVRA,3

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Bradley Cooper
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Columbia University
LOCATIONSantobello
PERSON
Chris Christie
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONHerman
PERSONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
the United States Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONPaden
PERSON