Epstein Secrets

N Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, EFTA00213024 Defendants. / DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/J

ceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United Stat

/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. -2- EFTA00222206 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121

roceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co.l Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regardini stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United State

N Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, EFTA00222788 Defendants. / DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/J

oceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. I Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United Stat

/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. -2- EFTA00222762 DOE II, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPS

roceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co.l Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regardini stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United State

N Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, EFTA00222778 Defendants. / DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/J

oceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. I Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United Stat

N Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, EFTA00222798 Defendants. / DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/J

oceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. I Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United Stat

993-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. -2- EFTA00599143 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121

ceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United State

ROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. : Good morning, Your Honor. Sid for Jane Doe II. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. WILLITS: Good morning, Your Honor

oceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.'" Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co.'. Alan° Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regardii stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United States