Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant tc INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDINWCPPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin

the course of it are to be admitted in evidence as proof of guilt." Herman, 544 F.2d at 797. Plea negoti imperative need for confidence and trust," Jaffee I. Redmond, 51 maintaining their confidentiality advances significant public and priva ons ar ooted in the 10 (1996), and f plea negotiations will cause "

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant tc INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDINWCPPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin

the course of it are to be admitted in evidence as proof of guilt." Herman, 544 F.2d at 797. Plea negoti imperative need for confidence and trust," Jaffee I. Redmond, 51 maintaining their confidentiality advances significant public and priva ons ar ooted in the 10 (1996), and f plea negotiations will cause "

Pagel 749 F.3d 999, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1270 (Cite as: 749 F.3d 999) H United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees, 1. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Roy Black, Martin G. Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, Intervenors-Appellants. No.

is rooted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the eviden- tiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee I. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 1928-31, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (1996)-but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new priv- ileg