Epstein Secrets

A-authorized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #2 P-008809 Thru P-008847 File folder entitled "[Victim namej/Jane Doe #6" containing meta-analysis of all phone, travel, and grand jury data related to that victim/witness for indictment preparation Work product

A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, R. Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafafia to J. Leflcowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black re interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Leflc

ict of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman Paul G. Cassell S.J. I uinne olle e of Law at the Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 2 EFTA00209307 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 1 of 14 SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE

o A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, R. Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafafia to J. Lefkowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black re interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Lefkow

; Doe II - Clerk's Notice of Reassignment 04/13/2009 RDC Receipt and review Doe ll's offer of settlement 04/13/2009 MJP Review and analysis of Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion to Slay 04/14/2009 RDC E-mails; review motions/responses re: Pacer on #2-7; Response to Stay 04/14/2009 RDC Co

ceptance of Summons and Complaint; 0.30 hr $150.00 Summons and Complaint on Doe 101 v. Epstein 04/20/2009 RHB Review e-mail correspondence from M. Weinberg re: CMA reply to Motion to 0.10 hr $30.00 Dismiss 04/20/2009 RHB Review case law referenced In M. Weinberg e-mail, rule of levity 0.40 hr $12

e informed the USAO and the FBI that she was not a victim of any offense committed by Epstein, and, as a result, the USAO did not consider informing Jane Doe #2 about the non-prosecution agreement. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 2(e). 3. Denied. 4. Denied. 5. The

o A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, R. Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafana to J. Lefkowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black m interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Lefkowit

FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S NOTICE OF FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO PRIVLEGE LOG COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also refe

A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, D. Lee re Agreement; 8/15/08 email from J. Lefkowitz to A. Marie Villafana, K. Atkinson, IL Black, M. Weinberg re Agreement; 8/14/08 emails from A. Marie Villafafla to J. Lefkowitz, K. Atkinson, R. Black re interpretation of Agreement; email from J. Lefkow