Epstein Secrets

That is the definition. 24 However, I'm also going to ask the parties to agree 25 upon an order that would expand the confidentiality agreement SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00076418 Case 20-2413, Document 44. 08/20/2020, 2913556, Page37 of 78 App.-0811 7 G4LMGIUC 1 to this exte

cole Simmons 2 EFTA00076390 Case Gaga4.407741333-IDARn-Offiuhiefle3MOQIXD, Filki5B33fface9:4191;91 of 4 App.-0783 United States District Court Southern District of New York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. NON-REDACTED DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. McCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF

Cr. 330 (AJN) (the "Criminal Action"). The information implicates Ms. Maxwell's right to due process and fairness in this civil action and affects the Second Circuit's review of the Court's unsealing order of July 23, 2020. Additionally, the information implicates her rights as a criminal defendant guaranteed unde

-AJN Document 234 Filed 04/22/21 Page 1 of 5 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN April 22, 2021 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. PagRoca Denver, Colorado 80203 wv.rw.nmnaw.com Re: U

. at I. That's because Ms. Maxwell's motions to suppress allege violations of the due process clause, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, and the Second Circuit's decision in Manindell v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979). If this Court agrees with Ms. Maxwell's arguments, not only

rsons: The Hon. Robert W. Sweet Paul G. Cassell District Judge ([email protected]) United States District Court for the Sigrid S. McCawley Southern District of New York ([email protected]) (via United States mail) Christine N. Walz ([email protected]) Madelaine J. Harrington (madelaine.har

at the district court (or the appellees) unjustifiably delayed resolution of the unseal motions and its abuse of discretion in failing to adhere to the Second Circuit's "clear[]"3 precedent. We respectfully submit that neither conclusion warrants the extraordinary action being contemplated by the panel. A. The dist

33-LAP Document 1100 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 3 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN August 10, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: 3, 2020 Order (Doc. 1096) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Haddon, Morgan and f

0 Cr. 330 (MN) (the "Criminal Action"). The information implicates Ms. Maxwell's right to due process and fairness in this civil action and affects the Second Circuit's review of the Court's unsealing order of July 23, 2020. Additionally, the information implicates her rights as a criminal defendant guaranteed unde

ourt's mandate is to undertake a particularized review of each document and to: (1) evaluate the weight of the presumption of public access to the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•• (212) 805-0300 EFTA00082165 L1JMGIUC 1 materials; (2) identify and evaluate the weight of any 2 countervailing interests; a

Messages involving the defendant. Portions of this document were redacted and released by the Second Circuit. So whatever happened with respect to the Second Circuit's release, we will abide by its ruling. 339. Response in opposition to the motion to compel. Unseal and redact the names, identifying information, a

33-LAP Document 1100 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 3 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN August 10, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: August 3, 2020 Order (Doc. 1096) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Haddon, Morgan

0 Cr. 330 (MN) (the "Criminal Action"). The information implicates Ms. Maxwell's right to due process and fairness in this civil action and affects the Second Circuit's review of the Court's unsealing order of July 23, 2020. Additionally, the information implicates her rights as a criminal defendant guaranteed unde

e New York, N.Y. March 26, 2019 4:04 p.m. HON. COLLEEN McMAHON, District Judge APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorney SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 SDNY_ GM_ 00000&53 EFTA00084766 2 Xj3q1gra

ation, but you can hear it in the questioning, you can read it in the press reports, you can intuit it from the order. I don't know if you've seen the Second Circuit's order that issued last week, but -- MR. : I have, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. You can intuit that something kind of unfavorable to Judge Sweet i

Defendant. THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Assistant United States Attorneys Of Counsel EFTA00088802 Table of Contents PRELI

nment to identify the co-conspirator statements it plans to use at trial in its initial round of pretrial motions. There, the defendant argued that the Second Circuit's practice of conditional admission of co-conspirator statements at trial would prejudice her because "any cautionary instruction would be of doubtful