Epstein Secrets

9 New York, New York apA pi Nati` s4 :Remo HONORABLE RICHARD M. BERMAN United States District Judge GEOFFREY S. BERMAN united States Attorney Southern District of New York By: /s/ Dated: -LIN as, 2019 New York, New York Assistant United States Attorneys JEFFREY EPSTEIN BY: ?g7--Ca g al-e/75 Martin W

uthorized to be disclosed to the public or disclosed beyond that which is necessary for the defense of this action, and other materials pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 ("Rule 16") and pursuant to any other disclosure obligations (collectively, the "Discovery"), which contain sensitive, confidential,

2019 New York, New York riatre4R s%ftna l t HONORABLE RICHARD M. BERMAN United States District Judge GEOFFREY S. BERMAN united States Attorney Southern District of New York By: /6/ Dated: -sulm as, 2019 New York, New York Assistant United States Attorneys JEFFREY EPSTEIN ielliC/ Martin Weinberg, Esq.

uthorized to be disclosed to the public or disclosed beyond that which is necessary for the defense of this action, and other materials pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 ("Rule 16") and pursuant to any other disclosure obligations (collectively, the "Discovery"), which contain sensitive, confidential,

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The SihioJ. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 November 18, 2021 BY E-MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Na

ntities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity named above; and (B) a signature purporting to be an execution or attestation. Finally, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 27 permits a party to "prove an official record . . . in the same manner as in a civil action." Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1),

SMITH I VILLAZOR November 19, 2021 BY E-MAIL to [email protected] The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: We represent the independ

o subpoena under Rule 17(h) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. A. Compliance with the subpoena would be unreasonable or oppressive. Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c)(2), the Court "may quash or modify the subpoena if compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive." Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c)(2). The

to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** There is no charge for viewing opinions. U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 4/27/2021 at 11:15 AM EDT and filed on 4/26/2021 Case Name: USA

te order. Finally, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer on the Government's proposal that the Defendant submit witness statements pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.2 at least four weeks in advance of trial. The parties are further ORDERED to submit a joint letter laying out their respective positi

e 16(d)(1), which the Government respectfully requests be filed ex parte and under seal. Respectfully submitted, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza 0007 EFTA00091439

S v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - ex parte sealed letter < Good evening, Attached for Judge Nathan's consideration please find a letter pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), which the Government respectfully requests be filed ex parte and under seal. Respectfully submitted, Assistant United States A

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 July 2020 By Electronic Mail Robert Glassman, Esq. Re: Request for Information Relati

rsuant to the applicable Touhy regulations, DOJ cannot provide any documents in its possession governed by the grand jury secrecy rules set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). See 28 U.S.C. § 16.26(b)(1). Please contact me once you have had a chance to review this letter if you would like to discuss the is

victims of Epstein's crimes have sued him civilly, some in Florida state court and some in federal court. Two victims filed a federal action in the Southern District of Florida for enforcement of the Crime Victim's Rights Act. (A-I). In that federal case, the victims' motion to compel production of the nonprosec

ments of law when unsealing the nonprosecution agreement because the agreement references federal grand jury proceedings, which are protected under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2). Epstein failed to raise this argument in his motion to make the agreement confidential, (A-13), and he did not demonstrate at th

procedure that allows you to go to the district court where the grand jury is case it would be in the of Florida before Judge convened, in this Southern District Marra and that is under Rule 6E, your Honor, I think it's 6E SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180861 19 1 3E actually.

w it for you. SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180859 17 i I 1 absolutely 100 percent protected from 2 disclosure by Federal Rule of Criminal 3 Procedure Six. I have a copy of that rule 4 for the Court. 5 THE COURT: Let me take a look of 6 that, please. 7 MR. GOLDBERGER: Give us o