Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (42)
Entities connected to both Rajaratnam and USDC SONY
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON8 w/ Rajaratnam·51 w/ USDC
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ Rajaratnam·30 w/ USDC
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rajaratnam·33 w/ USDC
United States
LOCATION9 w/ Rajaratnam·25 w/ USDC
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Rajaratnam·21 w/ USDC
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rajaratnam·21 w/ USDC
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Rajaratnam·14 w/ USDC
SA
Salameh
PERSON6 w/ Rajaratnam·15 w/ USDC
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rajaratnam·11 w/ USDC
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Rajaratnam·8 w/ USDC
Onondaga
LOCATION5 w/ Rajaratnam·9 w/ USDC
Brady
PERSON2 w/ Rajaratnam·11 w/ USDC
David Boies
PERSON7 w/ Rajaratnam·5 w/ USDC
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON7 w/ Rajaratnam·5 w/ USDC
Lugosch
PERSON5 w/ Rajaratnam·6 w/ USDC
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Rajaratnam·4 w/ USDC
MA
Martindell
PERSON6 w/ Rajaratnam·4 w/ USDC
DM
D. Martindell
PERSON5 w/ Rajaratnam·4 w/ USDC
See Chemical Bank
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rajaratnam·4 w/ USDC
Pillsbury Co.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rajaratnam·4 w/ USDC