he main folder) don't need to go onto Relativity. And I think I neglected to give similar info for the original folder linked to below ("2019-04-18, Boies Schiller second subpoena response") — in that folder, we do not need the "!Original Zips" folder or its contents, and do not need the three PDF documents in

sa.doj.gov\ clouaNYS StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 InvestigationVI 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \ Boies Schiller 2019-04-23 Boies Schiller second subpoena response (follow-up) Please note there are a few things from that folder that do NOT need to be uploaded — the folder titled "!Origi

ew all of this and still denied that Boies Schiller had any role in fomenting the investigation and claimed that there had been no contacts between Boies Schiller and his office before November 2018, when he claimed the investigation first began. None of these statements by AUSA to Judge McMahon were true.

18 IV. The Remedy for the Government's Misconduct 20 A. Pursuant to its Inherent Power, this Court Should Suppress the Evidence Obtained from Boies Schiller and Dismiss Counts Five and Six, which are the Fruits of that Evidence. 20 B. At a Minimum, this Court Should Order a Hearing at which Maxwell Ma

in a human trafficking scheme during the late 1990s and early 2000s involving dozens of underage girls. In a July 7 motion, Dershowitz argued that Boies Schiller shouldn't be allowed to continue to represent necause the firm has "severe" conflicts in the case. Those stem from an offer made in 2015 by Boies S

ategy in the case. The next day, Sires informed Dershowitz that a client conflict was going to prevent him from representing Dershowitz. Last week, Boies Schiller submitted a letter to the court stating that Dershowitz hadn't complied with the premotion conference rule; Judge Preska agreed and ordered his fili

v\ cloud\ NYS \ StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 \ Investigation \II 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \ Boles Schiller\ 2019-03-04 Boies Schiller first subpoena response In terms of structure, we'd like to create a folder identified as "Subpoena Returns" (at the same level as "FBI Case File" i

ov \cloud\ NYS \StAndrews\ Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 \ Investigation\ tt 2018 SONY investigation \Subpoena Returns \Boies Schiller \2019-03-04, Boies Schiller first subpoena response \al SUBPOENA EFTA00020770 --- PAGE BREAK --- RESPONSE 004582 (State Disc 1)\2. Walkthrough Video Please let me know if t

he main folder) don't need to go onto Relativity. And I think I neglected to give similar info for the original folder linked to below ("2019-04-18, Boies Schiller second subpoena response") — in that folder, we do not need the "!Original Zips" folder or its contents, and do not need the three PDF documents in

a.doj.gov\ clouANYS StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 InvestigationV4 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \ Boies Schiller\ 2019-04-23 Boies Schiller second subpoena response (follow-up) Please note there are a few things from that folder that do NOT need to be uploaded — the folder titled "!Origi

he main folder) don't need to go onto Relativity. And I think I neglected to give similar info for the original folder linked to below ("2019-04-18, Boies Schiller second subpoena response") — in that folder, we do not need the "!Original Zips" folder or its contents, and do not need the three PDF documents in

a.doj.gov\ clouANYS StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 InvestigationUt 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \ Boies Schiller\ 2019-04-23 Boies Schiller second subpoena response (follow-up) Please note there are a few things from that folder that do NOT need to be uploaded — the folder titled "!Origi

ershowitz Can Pursue Bid To DQ Boles Schiller In Sex Case Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:29:48 +0000 Importance: Normal Dershowitz Can Pursue Bid To DQ Boies Schiller In Sex Case By Andrew Strickler Share us on: By Andrew Strickler Law360 (June 18, 2019, 6:13 PM EDT) -- The New York federal judge who initially

in a human trafficking scheme during the late 1990s and early 2000s involving dozens of underage girls. In a July 7 motion, Dershowitz argued that Boies Schiller shouldn't be allowed to continue to represent because the firm has "severe" conflicts in the case. Those stem from an offer made in 2015 by Boies

oy \cloud\ NYS \StAndrews\ Shared \ USApstein-2018801618 \ Investigation \ tt 2018 SONY investigation \Subpoena Returns \Boies Schiller \2019-03-04, Boies Schiller first subpoena response \al SUBPOENA RESPONSE 004582 (State Disc 1)\2. Walkthrough Video Please let me know if there are any questions. Thank you.

a.doj.gov\ clouANYS StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 InvestigationVt 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \ Boles Schiller\ 2019-04-18 Boies Schiller second subpoena response In terms of structure, they can go under the "BSF returns" subfolder (under the folder "Subpoena Returns") under a new sub

a.doj.gov\ clouANYS StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 InvestigationVI 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \ Boies Schiller\ 2019-04-23 Boies Schiller second subpoena response (follow-up) Please note there are a few things from that folder that do NOT need to be uploaded — the folder titled "!Origi

ough entirely possible that we were in touch with additional victims through counsel—we spoke to Brad Edwards, Robert Josefsberg, Robbie Kaplan, and Boies Schiller, all of whom have multiple victim clients, some of whom we don't know the identities of. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 15:48

ys did you have a common interest privilege? A. Brad Edwards from, obviously, the law firm that I've been working with here. Also attorneys from the Boies Schiller law firm who were representing Virginia Roberts at that time. Q. Anyone else? A. The -- at that time, on December 30th, I don't know that it's dire

) the government acted in good faith; and (3) the government inevitably would have come to possess the 90,000-sum pages of material it obtained from Boies Schiller. The facts and law belie the government's claims. A. Maxwell has standing. The government's standing argument boils down to this: Maxwell cannot c

Usa.doj.gov clouANYS StAndrews \Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 InvestigationVI 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \ Boies Schiller 2019-03-04 Boies Schiller first subpoena response In terms of structure, we'd like to create a folder identified as "Subpoena Returns" (at the same level as "FBI Case File" i

Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:58 AM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re A1N/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented the plaintiff in the civil action. The two letters we submitted in connection with our All Writs Application are attached. From:

1, 2020, the Court said it was "troubled" to learn that plaintiff's successor counsel, Cooper & Kirk, had received from plaintiff's former counsel, Boies Schiller Flexner, various discovery materials that were subject to the Protective Order. Doc.1071 at 4. The Court rejected Cooper & Kirk's suggestion that i

it A. Background As described in the Application, the Government has served a grand jury subpoena (the "Subpoena") upon Boies Schiller & Flexner ("Boies Schiller") requiring the production of copies of discovery and related materials related to the Litigation. The Subpoena was validly issued pursuant to an o

viewed her sister Let me know if that works. Best, Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner If you would like to also interview I can set something up. BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP www.bsfIlp.corn From: [mailto Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 3:39 PM To: Sigrid McCawley Cc: Subject: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/2

\ cloud\ NYS \StAndrews\ Shared \ USvEpstein-2018R01618 \ Investigation \ tt 2018 SDNY investigation \Subpoena Returns \Boies Schiller \2019-03-04, Boies Schiller first subpoena response \al SUBPOENA RESPONSE 004582 (State Disc 1)\2. Walkthrough Video Please let me know if there are any questions. Thank you.

o prosecutors for the purpose of fomenting an investigation. But I am not faced with that situation. Nothing in this record suggests to me that or Boies Schiller had anything to do with the Government's decision to convene a grand jury to look into the matters that were the subject of the Action. On the con

a.doj.gov\ cloud\NYS\ StAndrews \ Shared USvEpstein-2018R01618‘InvestigationV*2018 SDNY investigation \ Subpoena Returns\ Boies Schiller\ 2019-03-04 Boies Schiller first subpoena response In terms of structure, we'd like to create a folder identified as "Subpoena Returns" (at the same level as "FBI Case File" i