Epstein Secrets

seal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith , 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

fully requests that the Court allow it to redact the personal telephone number and email address of its personnel, that appears on eighteen pages in Exhibit A to DE48. The information serves no evidentiary purpose. The United States has conferred with counsel for Petitioners on these matters. Petitioners have no

seal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith , 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

fully requests that the Court allow it to redact the personal telephone number and email address of its personnel, that appears on eighteen pages in Exhibit A to DE48. The information serves no evidentiary purpose. The United States has conferred with counsel for Petitioners on these matters. Petitioners have no

seal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith , 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

fully requests that the Court allow it to redact the personal telephone number and email address of its personnel, that appears on eighteen pages in Exhibit A to DE48. The information serves no evidentiary purpose. The United States has conferred with counsel for Petitioners on these matters, CONCLUSI