r against Ms. Nadine McGuire issued on April 6, 2011. - Initial Complaint, 5/11/11, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther, Case No.:2011 CA 003703 B, DC Superior Court, Judge Gregory Jackson presiding In regards to the suit against IBM (McGuire v. IBM, 1:11CV528, US District Court of Virginia), the only suit in whi

s of Gideon Richter, Ltd., 274 A.D.2d 1, 711 N.Y.S.2d 419 (1st Dep't 2000) oo. eeeeseseeseeseeeeeseeeteeseeeseeseeeees 13, 15 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596 (1982)... eeeceesescesseseeseeseeseescscesceseescesceesseeseecseeseseeseeseeaeaseeaeeacseeseesseateaseeeases 13, 14 In re Application

government has no obligation to obtain for a defendant records that it does not already have in its possession or control"); State ex rel. Romley v. Superior Court, 836 P.2d 445, 452 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992) ("Brady emphasizes suppression of evidence by the prosecution, but does not require the victim to cooperate

; and (5) the shared interest of the states in furthering substantive social policies. Metro. Life, 84 F.3d at 568 (citing Asahi Metal Indus. Co. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102, 1138-16, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 94 L.Ed.2d 92 (1987)). “These considerations sometimes serve to establish the reason- ableness of jurisdictio

e generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hen

access is an affirmative, enforceable public right, and the standing of the press to enforce it is well settled. See, e.g., Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 609 n.25 (1982); Hanford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, 380 F.3d 83, 91 (2d Cir. 2004). EFTA00017095 --- PAGE BREAK --- filing, on Au

2d Cir. 2019). Ms. Maxwell also specifically asserts her right to an open and public trial pursuant to the Sixth Amendment. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court (Press-Enterprise II), 478 U.S. 1, 7 (1986). Objections to Redactions Proposed on Pages 1-128 The government's proposed redactions on pages 1-128

estern District of Michigan Case No. 1:08-CR-68 Grand Rapids, MI March 10, 2011 32. Yakov Shlimovich v. Mikhail Cheban, et al Case No. BC408095 Superior Court of the State of California Los Angeles, CA March 25, 2011 33. USA v. Rami Saba U.S. Western District of Michigan Case No. 1:08-CR-68 Grand Rapi

iadithan NY NY State Supreme Court- NY Cminty Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Honda Virgin Islands Superior Court Minnesota SONY LialeaLCIaim Complaint tied on November 21, 2019 Complaint fled on December 3, 2019 Complaint filed on December 23, 2019 Compla

in the Probate Division of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. 37. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn filed a Certificate of Trust in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for Epstein's 1953 Trust on August 26, 2019. See Certificate of Trust, In the Matter of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Pro

shall at all times show that such investments are part of such trust; I. To register or not register such trust with the probate division of the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands or otherwise and to make all decisions which relate thereto; J. To give any Beneficiary of any trust hereunder

such investments are part of such trust; IS GJ 000366 EFTA00082287 I. To register or not register such trust with the probate division of the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands or otherwise and to make all decisions which relate thereto; J. To give any Beneficiary of any trust hereunder

ictitan NY NY State Supreme Court- NY County Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Bach County, Florida Virgin Islands Superior Court Minnesota SDNY nared .im Complaint filed on November 21.2019 Complaint filed on December 3, 2019 Complaint filed on December 23, 2019 Complain

Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering and Tracking ("SMART"). This request relates to the matter currently pending in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Case No. ST-2020-CV-14, filed by the GVI against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The complaint details numerous violations

ng as surrogates for the public."J9 48 Westmoreland v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk Cly., 457 U.S. 596, 606, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982)). 49 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 572-73, 100

de, depending on the circumstances, preserving "the right of an accused to fundamental fairness in the jury selection process," Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Court 11 EFTA00092318 In this case, the District Court erred in several respects.14 First, it failed to give proper weight to the presumption of acces

' Compensation Program (the "Program") presented by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") on November 14, 2019 to the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands (the "USVI Court") for approval. Our response does not constitute the Co-Executors' position regarding discovery

ecord. Dated: ATTEST: ESTRELLA H. GEORGE Clerk of the Court BY: Court Clerk Supervisor / / CAROLYN P. HERMON-PERCELL Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands EFTA00098145

shall at all times show that such investments are part of such trust; I. To register or not register such trust with the probate division of the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands or otherwise and to make all decisions which 23 GJ 00023 EFTA00099325 relate thereto; J. Except as otherwi

r against Ms. Nadine McGuire issued on April 6, 2011. - Initial Complaint, 5/11/11, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther, Case No.:2011 CA 003703 B, DC Superior Court, Judge Gregory Jackson presiding In regards to the suit against IBM (McGuire v. IBM, 1:11CV528, US District Court of Virginia), the only suit in whi