Epstein Secrets

estions Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014781 thru P-014800 3/19/2008-3/27/2008 emails between Jeff Sloman, Bob Senior, Karen Atkinson, Rolando Garcia, Nesbitt Kurykendall, and Jason Richards regarding waiting for DC's decision regarding Epstein's challenges to NPA

-013994 7/3/2007-7/4/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-7/6/2007 seri

llafafia regarding letter received from Lilly Ann Sanchez Work Product Deliberative Process 49 3/19/2008-3/27/2008 emails between Jeff Sloman, Bob Senior, Karen Atkinson, Rolando Garcia, Nesbitt Kurykendall, and Jason Richards regarding waiting for DC's decision regarding Epstein's challenges to NP

) Denied. (b) Denied. (c) Admitted. (d) Admitted. (e) Admitted to the extent that the reference to "Lillian Sanchez" was meant to refer to Lilly Ann Sanchez. (0 Admitted. (g) Admitted. 7. The government admits that, on about January 10, 2008, when Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe #2 were sent letters advisin

estions Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014781 thru P-014800 3/19/2008-3/27/2008 emails between Jeff Sloman, Bob Senior, Karen Atkinson, Rolando Garcia, Nesbitt Kurykendall, and Jason Richards regarding waiting for DC's decision regarding Epstein's challenges to NPA

-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-71612007 seri

estions Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014781 thru P-014800 3/19/2008-3/27/2008 emails between Jeff Sloman, Bob Senior, Karen Atkinson, Rolando Garcia, Nesbitt Kurykendall, and Jason Richards regarding waiting for DC's decision regarding Epstein's challenges to NPA

-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-716/2007 seri

reviewed this very matter with you and other individuals in your Office in November 2008. At that time, Mr. Roy Black met with you, Karen Atkinson, Bob Senior, and Jeffrey Sloman in Miami to review the work release issue. Among other significant documents shown to you, we presented you with your own email

NPA. As you know from past experience, and as Mr. Acosta previously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Ann Sanchez (on December 19, 2007), the language of 18 is "far from simple," and, in certain respects, subject to significant ambiguity. I believe it is both n

line to enter his guilty plea would be extended again, and we continued preparing for indictment (Exhibits B-34 through B-37). So, on May 27, 2008, Bob Senior, who took Matt Menchel's place as Criminal Chief, Jeff Sloman, who had taken over for USA Acosta due to his recusal from the Epstein matter, Karen

ld exploitation cases was an issue of growing concern, so I was mindful that this plea mechanism that Criminal Chief Menchel had devised with Lilly Ann Sanchez would extinguish, the victims' right to restitution. That was one of the reasons why, on July 4, 2007, I wrote to Mr. Menchel that I believed the p