Back to Network
11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 11
Mentions
Document Mentions (11 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
documents she believes it has in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letter
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (85)
Entities connected to both Descamps and Jencks Act
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·31 w/ Jencks
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·27 w/ Jencks
Giglio
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·26 w/ Jencks
United States
LOCATION14 w/ Descamps·21 w/ Jencks
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·20 w/ Jencks
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Descamps·22 w/ Jencks
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·18 w/ Jencks
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON11 w/ Descamps·21 w/ Jencks
FBI
ORGANIZATION14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
TH
Thompson
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
GA
Gaudin
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
SA
Salameh
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
WE
Werner
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
MA
Markiewicz
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
SA
Sampson
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
Forde
ORGANIZATION14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
Napolitano
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
NE
Nejad
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
Medina
PERSON14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION14 w/ Descamps·17 w/ Jencks