Back to People & Entities
DE
Descamps
Person
14
Total Mentions
14
Documents
111
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
Document Mentions (14)
1 mention
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
Page: EFTA00020270 →1 mention
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
Page: EFTA00022100 →1 mention
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
Page: EFTA00029549 →Sponsored
EFTA00085225.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00085225
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
EFTA00090494.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00090494
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
EFTA00092755.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092755
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
Sponsored
EFTA00092886.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092886
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
EFTA00103273.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103273
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
EFTA00103343.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103343
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
Sponsored
EFTA00103308.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103308
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
EFTA00103238.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103238
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
EFTA00104652.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00104652
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
Sponsored
EFTA00105663.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00105663
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
EFTA00154640.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00154640
ns—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine if the provision applies "and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions." Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254, 261 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute requires a categorical or case-specific approach i
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 111)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
14 docs14 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
14 docs14 co-mentions
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States
14 docs14 co-mentions
Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015
14 docs14 co-mentions
Murray
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple Murrays including Murray J. McCabe and Murray Gell-Mann in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
Brady
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
14 docs14 co-mentions
CO
Collins
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
SC
Schneider
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
WA
Walker
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
RU
Russo
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
TH
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
Leahy
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
JE
Jeffries
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
14 docs14 co-mentions
SA
Salameh
PersonLegal case citation: United States v. Salameh (misclassified as PERSON)
14 docs14 co-mentions
CU
Cunningham
PersonAmbiguous surname reference in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
WE
Werner
PersonBishop of the Roman Catholic Church
14 docs14 co-mentions
CO
Coppa
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
Vernon
PersonAmbiguous name reference in legal citations and Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions