5
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
s U.S. v. Epstein, 19-cr-490, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). Collins Editorial: Failures of ethics EFTA00069911 Buffalo News By News Editorial Board 7/29/19 The ethics specialists are right and so are the members of a special ethics panel, including both Democrats and R
ms in the case, cited as Jane Does, say the necessary remedy is for Epstein to face what they say are long overdue charges in Florida. "To be sure, Jane Doe 1 and 2 very much appreciate the laudable efforts of the diligent prosecutors in New York," their lawyers wrote. "But those New York charges, importan
rt, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). 16 EFTA00069941 SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Collins Editorial: Failures of ethics Buffalo News By News Editorial Board 7/29/19 The ethics specialists are right and so are the members of a special ethics panel, including both Democrats and R
fore-we-do-something-bad claim that deserves no credence from the Court," wrote Edwards and his co-counsel on behalf of the two women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. They also pointed out that the prosecutors weren't asserting the alleged "risk" to some victims outweighs obtaining justice for the
rs. The case is U.S. v. Epstein, 19-cr-490, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). Collins Editorial: Failures of ethics Buffalo News By News Editorial Board 7/29/19 The ethics specialists are right and so are the members of a special ethics panel, including both Democrats and R
fore-we-do-something-bad claim that deserves no credence from the Court," wrote Edwards and his co-counsel on behalf of the two women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. They also pointed out that the prosecutors weren't asserting the alleged "risk" to some victims outweighs obtaining justice for the
fore-we-do-something-bad claim that deserves no credence from the Court," wrote Edwards and his co-counsel on behalf of the two women, identified as Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2. They also pointed out that the prosecutors weren't asserting the alleged "risk" to some victims outweighs obtaining justice for
Page: EFTA00018446 →rs. The case is U.S. v. Epstein, 19-cr-490, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). Collins Editorial: Failures of ethics Buffalo News By News Editorial Board 7/29/19 The ethics specialists are right and so are the members of a special ethics panel, including both Democrats and R
Page: EFTA00018452 →ion 12 years later, after receiving arguments from lawyers for two of Epstein's victims, prosecutors and Epstein. The victims in the case, cited as Jane Does, say the necessary remedy is for Epstein to face what they say are long overdue charges in Florida. "To be sure, Jane Doe 1 and 2 very much appreci
Page: EFTA00018471 →t of New York (Manhattan). 16 EFTA00018481 --- PAGE BREAK --- SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Collins Editorial: Failures of ethics Buffalo News By News Editorial Board 7/29/19 The ethics specialists are right and so are the members of a special ethics panel, including both Democrats and R
Page: EFTA00018482 →Entities connected to both Buffalo News and Jane Doe

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONJack Scarola
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSONSpencer Kuvin
PERSON
Palm Beach County
LOCATION
New York
LOCATION
Marc Rich
PERSON
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION