Epstein Secrets

sent him a letter on July 25, 2008, explaining that the government believed 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(5) was not triggered until an offense was charged in United States District Court. We also stated that, in the government's view, the relevant facts were: (1) there are no charges in district court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; a

9:24 AM To: Paul Cassell. Brad Edwards Subject: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Paul and Brad, Attached please find a revised Joint Statement of Facts, which indicates what the government agrees is factually correct and relevant to the resolution of this case. I switched the first two paragraphs, t

I sent him a letter on July 25, 2008, explaining that the government believed 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(5) was not triggered until an offense was charged in United States District Court. We also stated that, in the government's view, the relevant facts were: (1) there are no charges in district court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; a

ell; Brad Edwards Cc: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Attached please find a revised Joint Statement of Facts, which indicates what the government agrees is factually correct and relevant to the resolution of this case. I switched the first two paragraphs,

sent him a letter on July 25, 2008, explaining that the government believed 18 U.S.C. 3771(a) (5) was not triggered until an offense was charged in United States District Court. We also stated that, in the government's view, the relevant facts were: (1) there are no charges in district court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; a

Cassell; Brad Edwards Cc: . (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Paul and Brad, Attached please find a revised Joint Statement of Facts, which indicates what the government agrees is factually correct and relevant to the resolution of this case. I switched the first two paragraphs,

sent him a letter on July 25, 2008, explaining that the government believed 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(5) was not triggered until an offense was charged in United States District Court. We also stated that, in the government's view, the relevant facts were: (1) there are no charges in district court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; a

s Cc: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Paul and Brad, Attached please find a revised Joint Statement of Facts, which indicates what the government agrees is factually correct and relevant to the resolution of this case. I switched the first two paragraphs,

sent him a letter on July 25, 2008, explaining that the government believed 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(5) was not triggered until an offense was charged in United States District Court. We also stated that, in the government's view, the relevant facts were: (1) there are no charges in district court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; a

November 22, 2010 9:24 AM To rds cc: Subject: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Paul and Brad, Attached please find a revised Joint Statement of Facts, which indicates what the government agrees is factually correct and relevant to the resolution of this case. I switched the first two paragraphs, t

I sent him a letter on July 25, 2008, explaining that the government believed 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(5) was not triggered until an offense was charged in United States District Court. We also stated that, in the government's view, the relevant facts were: (1) there are no charges in district court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; a

ent: on a llovember 22 2010 9:24 AM To: Cc: . AELS) Subject: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Attached please find a revised Joint Statement of Facts, which indicates what the government agrees is factually correct and relevant to the resolution of this case. I switched the first two paragraphs,

sent him a letter on July 25, 2008, explaining that the government believed 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(5) was not triggered until an offense was charged in United States District Court. We also stated that, in the government's view, the relevant facts were: (1) there are no charges in district court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; a

AM To: Paul Cassell• Brad Edwards Cc: Subject: Revised Joint Statement of Facts Paul and Brad, Attached please find a revised Joint Statement of Facts, which indicates what the government agrees is factually correct and relevant to the resolution of this case. I switched the first two paragraphs,

ad claim that because it choose (for reasons that have never been explained) not to file "federal criminal charges . . . against Jeffrey Epstein in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, . . [the victims] cannot invoke any protections under the CVRA." Gov't Resp. at 8. This sweeping position is simply

o reply to the Government's Response (DE #58) to their Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE #49). The victims' proffered facts should all be accepted by the Court. The Government claims that it can prevail regardless of what the true f

on of the filing to all counsel of record. I also certify that I mailed a copy of the opening brief to: The Hon. Loretta A. Preska District Judge United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (via United States mail) s/ Nicole Simmons 43 EFTA00075525 Case 20-2413, Document 40. 08/20/2020. 291355

f 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest, and the indictment. 7