
68
Total Mentions
61
Documents
343
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
EFTA00177793
1 a Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 03/21/2011) • 03/21/2011 52 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing
n roa Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts filed by United States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 52 RESPONSE in Opposition rejQ Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and
EFTA00179613_sub_002 - EFTA00179613_184
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00179738 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA00615869
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00615908 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 265-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2014 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den
EFTA00081116
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00081155 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA00208608
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00208647 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den
EFTA00209211
1 42 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 03/21/2011) 03/21/2011 51 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing th
re 49 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts filed by United States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 59 RESPONSE in Opposition re 50 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 an
EFTA00211439
49 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 03/21/2011) 03/21/2011 50 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing t
pposition re 49 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Becaus ernment's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts filed by United States of America. ( (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 59 RESPONSE in Opposition re 50 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Do
EFTA00205224
[49] Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts, [51] Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Use Correspondence to Prove Violations of the Crime Victims' Right Act and to Have
EFTA00205107
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA00178057
o reply to the Government's Response (DE #58) to their Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE #49). The victims' proffered facts should all be accepted by the Court. The Government claims that it can prevail regardless of what the true f
EFTA00204997
e Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52), Plaintiffs' Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Motion to Inter
EFTA00205116
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA00204879
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA00205254
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA00157655
the Deputy Attorney General end federal involvement in this matter so that the State of Florida may resolve this case appropriately. Summary of the Facts Mr. Epstein has maintained a home in Palm Beach, Florida for the past 20 years. While there, he routinely conducted business, received medical atte
EFTA00205406
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00205406 On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, h
EFTA00205293
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA01318424
FORMATION Fud Surcharge' FecEx has espied a fuel surcharge of 300% to gas :hPmenl. Distance Based Pricing. Zone 6 Pirdore ser4 horn: 33480 20 code Facts has audited this shpment for timed packages. eagle. and service. Any changes made are Sleeted in the invoke amount. Trading ID 837574508960 Sena T
EFTA00205329
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co
EFTA00205380
(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings

Bradley Edwards
PersonAmerican attorney who represented Epstein victims, author of Relentless Pursuit

Paul Cassell
PersonUnited States federal judge
Leon Black
PersonAmerican billionaire businessman (born 1951)

Kenneth Marra
PersonAmerican judge
Roy Black
PersonAmerican lawyer (1945–2025)

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)
the Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City

Jay Lefkowitz
PersonAmerican lawyer
Maria Farmer
PersonAmerican visual artist

Department of Justice
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice, federal executive department responsible for law enforcement

United States Department of Justice
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)

the Internal Revenue Service
OrganizationInternal Revenue Service (IRS), US government agency responsible for tax collection and enforcement
the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents

Reinhart
PersonRefers to Bruce Reinhart, former federal prosecutor who became Palm Beach County judge in Epstein case
the Criminal Divisions
OrganizationGovernment agency