Epstein Secrets

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr.

.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr. from Eisenberg to AUSA ; Ex. S, ¶¶ 6-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured her state

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the government violated their rights under the Crime Victi

.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr. from Eisenberg to AUSA Villafafia; Ex. S, 6-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured he

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr.

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi

q.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Is. from Eisenberg to AUSA Villafafia; Ex. S, ¶16-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured h

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Is. f

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi